Decided

No. 15-1248

McLane Company, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Ginsburg, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

Argued. For petitioner: Allyson N. Ho, Dallas, Tex. For respondent: Rachel P. Kovner, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For Court-appointed amicus curiae: Stephen B. Kinnaird, Washington, D. C.

Reply of respondent Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed. (Distributed)

Reply of petitioner McLane Company, Inc. filed. (Distributed)

Motion for allocation of argument time GRANTED.

Record received from the U.S.D.C. District of Arizona is electronic and located on PACER. Also received are SEALED documents that are electronic.

Motion for allocation of argument time filed by respondent Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

CIRCULATED.

Record received from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.

Brief of Stephen B. Kinnaird Court-appointed amicus curiae defending the judgment below filed.

Record requested from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.

SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, February 21, 2017.

Brief of respondent Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed.

Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed.

Brief amici curiae of Equal Employment Advisory Council, et al. filed.

Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or neither party from counsel for the respondent.

Joint appendix filed. Volumes I & II (Statement of costs filed)

Brief of petitioner McLane Company, Inc. filed.

The brief of the Court-appointed amicus curiae is to be filed on or before January 10, 2017.

Stephen B. Kinnaird, Esquire, of Washington, D.C., is invited to brief and argue this case, as amicus curiae, in support of the position that a district court's decision to quash or enforce an EEOC subpoena is subject to de novo review. Briefs of other amici curiae in support of the judgment below are to be filed within 7 days of the filing of the brief of Court-appointed amicus curiae.

Letter from counsel for the respondent filed.

Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for petitioner.

Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.

Reply of petitioner McLane Company, Inc. filed. (Distributed)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016.

Brief of respondent Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in opposition filed.

Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including July 6, 2016.

Brief amicus curiae of Equal Employment Advisory Council filed.

Order extending time to file response to petition to and including June 6, 2016.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 6, 2016)

Parties

McLane Company, Inc., Petitioner, represented by Allyson N. Ho

McLane Company, Inc., Petitioner, represented by Andrew M. Jacobs

Court-appointed amicus curiae defending the judgment below, Respondent, represented by Stephen B. Kinnaird

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Respondent, represented by Jeffrey B. Wall

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Respondent, represented by Rachel Peter Kovner

Amici Curiae

Equal Employment Advisory Council, Amicus Curiae, represented by Michael Patrick Bracken

Law Professors, Amicus Curiae, represented by Evan A. Young

 
Last updated: September 24, 2017