from the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One
See other cases from Arizona.
MANDATE ISSUED.
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. ____ (2016). Justice Sotomayor concurs in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand. See Tatum v. Arizona, 580 U.S. ___ (2016) (Sotomayor, J., concurring). Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins, dissents from the decision to grant, vacate, and remand. See Tatum v. Arizona, 580 U.S. ___ (2016) (Alito, J., dissenting).
Reply of petitioner Scott Lee DeShaw filed.
Brief of respondent Arizona in opposition filed.
Response Requested . (Due July 6, 2016)
Waiver of right of respondent Arizona to respond filed.
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 25, 2016)
Scott Lee DeShaw, Petitioner, represented by Keith J. Hilzendeger
Arizona, Respondent, represented by Diane M. Meloche
Arizona, Respondent, represented by Adele G. Ponce