Argued

No. 16-369

County of Los Angeles, California, et al. v. Angel Mendez, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Argued. For petitioners: E. Joshua Rosenkranz, New York, N. Y.; and Nicole A. Saharsky, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Leonard Feldman, Seattle, Wash.

Reply of petitioners County of Los Angeles, California, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.

Brief amicus curiae of National Police Accountability Project filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae The American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Southern California filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Brief amicus curiae of The Rutherford Institute filed. (Distributed)

CIRCULATED.

Brief amicus curiae of The Georgetown University Law Center Chapter of the Black Law Students Association filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondents Angel Mendez, and Jennifer Lynn Garcia filed.

Record received from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit. The record is electronic and available on PACER.

SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, March 22, 2017

Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.

Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.

Brief amici curiae of California State Sheriffs' Association, et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Major County Sheriffs' Association filed.

Brief amici curiae of National Association of Counties, et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Los Angeles County Police Chiefs' Association filed.

Brief of petitioners Los Angeles County, California, et al. filed.

Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or of neither party received from counsel for the petitioners.

Petition GRANTED limited to Questions 1 and 3 presented by the petition.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 2, 2016.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 22, 2016.

Reply of petitioners Los Angeles County, California, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondents Angel Mendez, et al. in opposition filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 24, 2016)

Parties

County of Los Angeles, California, et al., Petitioner, represented by Melinda Cantrall

County of Los Angeles, California, et al., Petitioner, represented by E. Joshua Rosenkranz

Angel Mendez, and Jennifer Lynn Garcia, Respondent, represented by Leonard J. Feldman

Amici Curiae

California State Sheriffs' Association, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Martin J. Mayer

County of Los Angeles, California, et al. v. Angel Mendez, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Nicole A. Saharsky

Los Angeles California County Police Chiefs' Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by J. Scott Tiedemann

Major County Sheriffs' Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Gaetan Gerville-Reache

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by William Harry Ehlies II.

National Association of Counties, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Daniel P. Collins

National Police Accountability Project, Amicus Curiae, represented by Christopher Wimmer

The American Civil Liberties Union and The ACLU of Southern California, Amicus Curiae, represented by David D. Cole

The Georgetown University Law Center Chapter of the Black Law Students Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Aderson Bellegarde Francois

The Rutherford Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Anand Agneshwar

United States, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jeffrey B. Wall

 
Last updated: April 27, 2017