Denied

No. 16-500

R. P., et ux. v. Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services, et al.

from the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District

See other cases from California.

Docket Entries

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.

Petition DENIED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 6, 2017.

Reply of petitioners R. P., et ux. filed.

Letter of December 19, 2016, from counsel for petitioner received waiving the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5.

Brief of respondent Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma in opposition filed.

Brief of respondent Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services in opposition filed.

Brief of respondent Father J.E. in opposition filed. (Distributed)

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Father J.E. (Distributed)

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent The Minor, Alexandria P.

Brief of respondent The Minor, Alexandria P. in opposition filed.

Brief amicus curiae of American Academy of Adoption Attorneys filed.

Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondent Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma.

Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 14, 2016, for all respondents.

Brief amici curiae of Goldwater Institute and Cato Institute filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 14, 2016)

Parties

R. P., et ux., Petitioner, represented by Lori Alvino McGill

Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, Respondent, represented by Michael Sean Burrage

Father J.E., Respondent, represented by Joanne Willis Newton

Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent, represented by Kim Nemoy

The Minor, Alexandria P., Respondent, represented by Christopher Blake

Amici Curiae

American Academy of Adoption Attorneys, Amicus Curiae, represented by Mark David Fiddler

Goldwater Institute and Cato Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Timothy Sandefur

 
Last updated: March 24, 2017