Decided

No. 05-998

United States v. Juan Resendiz-Ponce

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Statement of costs for printing received.

Record returned to U.S.D.C. for District of Arizona

Record returned to U.S.C.A. for 9th Circuit.

Acknowledgement of receipt (02/13/07) of judgment from Clerk, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit received.

JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Stevens, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Alito, JJ., joined. Scalia, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

Supplemental reply brief of respondent Juan Resendiz-Ponce filed. (Distributed)

Supplemental reply brief of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)

Supplemental brief of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)

Supplemental brief of respondent Juan Resendiz-Ponce filed. (Distributed)

The parties are directed to file supplemental briefs addressing the following Question: "Did the indictment omit an allegation that was required by the Fifth Amendment " The briefs, not to exceed 25 pages, are to be filed simultaneously with the Clerk a

Argued. For petitioner: Michael R. Dreeben, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. For respondent: Altmore L. Baggot, Apache Junction, Ariz. (Appointed by this Court.)

Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 6, 2006..

Response of counsel to opposition to motion for appointment of counsel.

Opposition of Juan Resendez-Ponce to motion for appointment of counsel.

Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)

Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Federal Defenders filed. (Distributed)

Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondent Juan Resendiz-Ponce filed. (Distributed)

Record received from U.S.D.C. for District of Arizona (Phoenix). (1 box)

Brief amicus curiae of Paul Hardy filed. (Distributed)

Record received from U.S.C.A. for the 9th Circuit.

Extension of time within which to file respondent's brief on the merits to and including August 25, 2006.

CIRCULATED.

SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, October 10, 2006.

Letter from the Solicitor General regarding Joint Appendix received. (Distributed).

Joint appendix filed.

Brief of petitioner United States filed.

Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent GRANTED. Atmore Baggot, Esquire, of Apache Junction, Arizona is appointed to serve as counsel for the respondent in this case. (orders list)

Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 25, 2006.

Extension of time within which to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits to and including June 23, 2006.

Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent Juan Resendiz-Ponce.

Petition GRANTED. (orders list)

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. (orders list)

Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 14, 2006.

Brief of respondent Juan Resendiz-Ponce in support filed.

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 10, 2006)

Application (05A582) granted by Justice O'Connor extending the time to file until February 8, 2006.

Application (05A582) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 9, 2006 to February 8, 2006, submitted to Justice O'Connor.

Parties

United States, Petitioner, represented by Paul D. Clement

Juan Resendiz-Ponce, Respondent, represented by Atmore Baggot

Amici Curiae

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jeffrey T. Green

National Association of Federal Defenders, Amicus Curiae, represented by Steven F. Hubachek

Paul Hardy, Amicus Curiae, represented by Herbert V. Larson Jr.

 
Last updated: September 20, 2007