Decided

No. 06-1535

v. v. Docketed:May 21, 2007

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

See other cases from the Sixth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Acknowledgement of receipt (11/13/07) of judgment from Clerk, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit received.

JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. (orders list)

Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Carey v. Musladin, 549 U. S. ___ (2006), and Schriro v. Landrigan, 550 U.S. ____ (2007). Justice Stevens, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice Breyer would deny the p... (orders list)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 5, 2007.

Reply of petitioner Stuart Hudson, Warden filed.

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Frank G. Spisak, Jr.

Brief of respondent Frank G. Spisak, Jr. in opposition filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 20, 2007)

Appendix of Stuart Hudson, Warden filed.

Parties

Marc C. Houk, Warden, Petitioner, represented by Elise W. Porter

Stuart Hudson, Warden, Petitioner, represented by William Porter Marshall

Stuart Hudson, Warden, Petitioner, represented by William P. Marshall

Frank G. Spisak, Jr., Respondent, represented by Michael J. Benza

 
Last updated: November 7, 2011