from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
See other cases from the Eighth Circuit.
Acknowledgement of receipt (07/12/07) of judgment from Clerk, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit received.
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Record returned to U.S.C.A. for Eighth Circuit.
Record returned to U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Vacated as moot. Opinion per curiam. (orders list)
Response to motion for disposition of case filed by respondent United States. (Distributed)
Motion for Disposition of Case filed by petitioner Mario Claiborne. (Distributed)
Argued. For petitioner: Michael Dwyer, Assistant Federal Public Defender, St. Louis, Mo. For respondent: Michael R. Dreeben, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
Reply of petitioner Mario Claiborne filed. (Distributed)
Record received from U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Missouri. (1 box) There are sealed documents in this record.
Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed),
Brief amicus curiae of United States Sentencing Commission filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of Senators Edward M. Kennedy, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Record received from U.S.C.A. for Eighth Circuit.
CIRCULATED.
Motion to file Volume II of the joint appendix under seal. GRANTED. (orders list)
Brief amici curiae of Federal Public and Community Defenders, et al. filed. VIDED.
SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, February 20, 2007.
Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. VIDED.
Brief amicus curiae of Families Against Mandatory Minimums filed. VIDED.
Brief amici curiae of The Sentening Project, et al. filed.
Brief amicus curiae of New York Council of Defense Lawyers filed.
Brief of petitioner Mario Claiborne filed.
Brief amici curiae of Law Professors Who Study Sentencing Reform filed. VIDED.
Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation, et al. filed. VIDED.
Joint appendix Volume I filed.
Motion to file Volume II of the joint appendix under seal. filed by petitioner Mario Claiborne.
Consent to the filing of amicus briefs in support of either party received from counsel for the petitioner
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED limited to the following Questions: 1) Was the district court's choice of below-Guidelines sentence reasonable 2) In making that determination, is it consistent with Unit (orders list)
Reply of petitioner Mario Claiborne filed. (Distributed)
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
Response Requested . (Due October 16, 2006)
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 31, 2006)
Mario Claiborne, Petitioner, represented by Michael Dwyer
United States, Respondent, represented by Paul D. Clement
United States, Respondent, represented by Michael R. Dreeben
Families Against Mandatory Minimums, Amicus Curiae, represented by Gregory L. Poe
Federal Public and Community Defenders, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Thomas W. Hillier
Law Professors Who Study Sentencing Reform, Amicus Curiae, represented by Edward S. Lee
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amicus Curiae, represented by Miguel A. Estrada
New York Council of Defense Lawyers, Amicus Curiae, represented by Alexandra A.E. Shapiro
Senators Edward M. Kennedy, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Robert E. Toone Jr.
The Sentening Project, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Matthew M. Shors
United States Sentencing Commission, Amicus Curiae, represented by David C. Frederick
Washington Legal Foundation, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Paul D. Kamenar