from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
See other cases from the District of Columbia Circuit.
Record returned to U.S.C. A. for District of Columbia Circuit.
Acknowledgement of receipt (06/25/07) of judgment from Clerk, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit received.
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Certiorari denied. Stevens, J. delivered the opinion of the Court, in which all other Members joined, except Roberts, C.J., who took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. (orders list)
Argued. For appellant: Jean M. Manning, Senate Chief Counsel for Employment, Washington, D.C. For appellee: Richard A. Salzman, Washington, D.C.; and Thomas E. Caballero, Assistant Senate Legal Counsel, Washigton, D.C. (for United States Senate, a...
Argued. For appellant: Jean M. Manning, Senate Chief Counsel for Employment, Washington, D.C. For appellee: Richard A. Salzman, Washington, D.C.; and Thomas E. Caballero, Assistant Senate Legal Counsel, Washigton, D.C. (for United States Senate, as am
Reply of appellant Office of Senator Mark Dayton filed. (Distributed)
Motion of United States Senate for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion. (orders list)
Motion of United States Senate for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
Brief amicus curiae of United States Senate filed. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of Congressmen Barney Frank and Christopher Shays filed. (Distributed)
Brief of appellee Brad Hanson filed. (Distributed).
Brief amicus curiae of AARP filed. (Distributed)
Docket sheet received from U.S.D.C. for the District of Columbia Circuit. This case is Electronically filed.
Consent to the filing of amicus briefs in support of either party received from counsel for the respondent.
CIRCULATED.
Brief amicus curiae of President Pro Tempore of the Senate of Pennsylvania filed.
Brief of appellant Office of Senator Mark Dayton filed.
Joint appendix filed.
Record received from U.S.C.A. for District of Columbia Circuit. (1 envelope)
SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, April 24, 2007.
Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction is POSTPONED to the hearing of the case on the merits. In addition to the Question presented by the statement as to jurisdiction, counsel are directed to brief and argue the following Questions: ...
Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction is POSTPONED to the hearing of the case on the merits. In addition to the Question presented by the statement as to jurisdiction, counsel are directed to brief and argue the following Questions: 1) W
Opposition of appellee to the suggestion of mootness filed. (Distributed)
Suggestion of mootness filed by appellant Office of Senator Mark Dayton. (Distributed)
Opposition to motion of appellant Office of Senator Mark Dayton filed.
Motion to dismiss or affirm filed by appellee Brad Hanson.
Order extending time to file response to jurisdictional statement to and including December 18, 2006.
Statement as to jurisdiction filed. (Response due December 4, 2006)
Brad Hanson, Appellant, represented by Douglas B. Huron
Brad Hanson, Appellant, represented by Richard Salzman
Office of Senator Mark Dayton, Appellant, represented by Jean Marie Manning
AARP, Amicus Curiae, represented by Thomas W. Osborne
Congressmen Barney Frank and Christopher Shays, Amicus Curiae, represented by Traci L. Lovitt
President Pro Tempore of the Senate of Pennsylvania, Amicus Curiae, represented by John P. Krill Jr.
United States Senate, Amicus Curiae, represented by Morgan J. Frankel
United States Senate, Amicus Curiae, represented by Thomas E. Caballero