from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
See other cases from the Seventh Circuit.
JUDGEMENT ISSUED.
Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Argued. For petitioners: Theodore M. Becker, Chicago, Ill. For respondents: David W. DeBruin, Washington, D.C.; and Eric D. Miller, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)
Reply of petitioners John Bridge, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED. (orders list)
Record received from the U.S.D.C. for the Northern District of Illinois.
CIRCULATED.
Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of Connecticut, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Shareholder and Consumer (Distributed)Attorneys filed.
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
Brief amicus curiae of International Association of Insurance Receivers filed. (Distributed)
Brief of respondents Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co., et al. filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.
Brief amicus curiae of McKesson Corporation filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.
Joint appendix filed. (Joint appendix in two volumes).
Brief of petitioner John Bridge, et al. filed.
Record received from the U.S.C.A for the 7th Circuit. (1 box)
SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, April 14, 2008.
Petition GRANTED limited to the following Question: “Whether reliance is a required element of a RICO claim predicated on mail fraud and, if it is, whether that reliance must be by the plaintiff.” The brief of petitioners is to be filed on or before Thur (orders list)
Reply of petitioners John Bridge, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Brief amicus curiae of McKesson Corporation filed.
Brief of respondents Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co., et al.
Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including November 16, 2007.
Order extending time to file response to petition to and including October 17, 2007.
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 17, 2007)
Application (07A4) granted by Justice Stevens extending the time to file until August 15, 2007.
Application (07A4) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 16, 2007 to August 15, 2007, submitted to Justice Stevens.
John Bridge, et al., Petitioner, represented by Theodore M. Becker
BCS Services, Inc., Respondent, represented by Lowell E. Sachnoff
Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co., et al., Respondent, represented by David W. DeBruin
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Amicus Curiae, represented by Gene C. Schaerr
Connecticut, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Robert B.aruch Teitelman
International Association of Insurance Receivers, Amicus Curiae, represented by C. Philip Curley
John Bridge, et al. v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co., et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Eric David Miller
McKesson Corporation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Beth S. Brinkmann
National Association of Shareholder and Consumer Attorneys, Amicus Curiae, represented by Kevin P. Roddy
the United States, Amicus Curiae, represented by Gregory G. Garre
Washington Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Richard A. Samp