from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. (orders list)
Supplemental brief of petitioner Stanley R. Siler filed. (Distributed)
Supplemental brief of petitioner Stanley R. Siler filed.
Waiver of right of respondent Barry Groce, et al. to respond filed.
Waiver of right of respondent Sedgwick of Oregon, Inc. to respond filed.
Waiver of right of respondent Dillingham Ship Repair to respond filed.
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 28, 2008)
Stanley R. Siler, Petitioner, pro se
Barry Groce, et al., Respondent, represented by Don G. Carter
Dillingham Ship Repair, Respondent, represented by Dennis R. VavRosky
Sedgwick of Oregon, Inc., Respondent, represented by James Thomas McDermott