Denied

No. 08-759

Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. San Diego County, California, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED. (orders list)

Supplemental brief of petitioner Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. filed. (Distributed)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 25, 2009.

Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. VIDED.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 20, 2009.

Reply of petitioner Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondents San Diego County, California, et al. in opposition filed.

Brief amicus curiae of City of St. Louis, Missouri filed.

Brief amici curiae of NextG Networks of California, Inc., and the DAS Forum filed.

Brief amici curiae of PCIA - The Wireless Infrastructure Association, et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Level 3 Communications, LLC in Support of Neither Party filed.

Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 11, 2009.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 12, 2009)

Parties

Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P., Petitioner, represented by Kannon K. Shanmugam

San Diego County, California, et al., Respondent, represented by Thomas D. Bunton

Amici Curiae

City of St. Louis, Missouri, Amicus Curiae, represented by Kenneth A. Brunetti

Level 3 Communications, LLC, Amicus Curiae, represented by Thomas C. Goldstein

NextG Networks of California, Inc., and the DAS Forum, Amicus Curiae, represented by T. Scott Thompson

PCIA - The Wireless Infrastructure Association, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Robert Jystad

United States, Amicus Curiae, represented by Elena Kagan

 
Last updated: May 17, 2009