Decided

No. 09-1159

Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

See other cases from the Federal Circuit.

Docket Entries

Record returned to U.S.C.A. for Federal Circuit.

JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed a concurring opinion. Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Gin... (orders list)

Argued. For petitioner: Donald B. Ayer, Washington, D. C.; and Malcolm L. Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Mark C. Fleming, Boston, Mass.

Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED. (orders list)

Reply of petitioner Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University filed. (Distributed)

Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Owners Association filed. (Distributed)

Lodging request received from counsel for the respondents.

Brief amicus curiae of Biotechnology Industry Organization filed. (Distributed)

Brief amicus curiae of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of Intel Corporation, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of American Association of University Professors, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondents Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., et al. filed.

Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.

Record received from U.S.C.A. for Federal Circuit. (1 box)

CIRCULATED.

Brief amicus curiae of Birch Bayh filed.

SET FOR ARGUMENT Monday, February 28, 2011.

Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.

Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association filed.

Brief amicus curiae of National Venture Capital Association filed.

Brief amicus curiae of BayhDole25, Inc. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Federal Defenders filed.

Brief amicus curiae of John Sutton filed.

Brief amici curiae of Association of American Universities, et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Alexander M. Shukh, Ph.D. filed.

The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including January 25, 2011.

Supplemental joint appendix filed.

Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)

Brief of petitioner Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University filed.

Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondents.

Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the peititoner

Petition GRANTED. (orders list)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 29, 2010.

Supplemental brief of respondents Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 24, 2010.

Reply of petitioner Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondents Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.

Brief amici curiae of Association of American Universities, et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Massachusetts Institute of Technology filed.

Brief amici curiae of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, et al. filed.

Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 26, 2010.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 26, 2010)

Parties

Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, Petitioner, represented by Donald B. Ayer

Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, Petitioner, represented by Ricardo Rodriguez

Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., et al., Respondent, represented by Adrian M. Pruetz

Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., et al., Respondent, represented by Paul R.Q. Wolfson

Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., et al., Respondent, represented by Mark C. Fleming

Amici Curiae

Alexander M. Shukh, Ph.D., Amicus Curiae, represented by Constantine John Gekas

American Association of University Professors, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by David P. Swenson

American Intellectual Property Law Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by David W. Hill

Association of American Universities, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Douglas Hallward-Driemeier

BayhDole25, Inc., Amicus Curiae, represented by Douglas D. Salyers

Biotechnology Industry Organization, Amicus Curiae, represented by Carter G. Phillips

Birch Bayh, Amicus Curiae, represented by William D. Coston

Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Malcolm L. Stewart

Intel Corporation, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Matthew D. McGill

Intellectual Property Owners Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by George L. Graff

John Sutton, Amicus Curiae, represented by John P Sutton

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Amicus Curiae, represented by Kelly M. Klaus

National Association of Federal Defenders, Amicus Curiae, represented by Rebecca L. Pennell

National Venture Capital Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Sri Srinivasan

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Amicus Curiae, represented by Robert A. Long Jr.

United States, Amicus Curiae, represented by Neal Kumar Katyal

Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Michelle M. Umberger

 
Last updated: August 28, 2011