Removed from Docket

No. 09-5400

James Bryan Menke v. Philip C. Gaddy, et al.

from the Court of Appeals of New Mexico

See other cases from New Mexico.

Docket Entries

Case considered closed.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 26, 2009, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of t (orders list)

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 26, 2009, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules ... (orders list)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2009.

Reply of petitioner James Bryan Menke filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondents Philip C. Gaddy, et al. in opposition filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 24, 2009)

Parties

James Bryan Menke, Petitioner, pro se

Philip C. Gaddy, et al., Respondent, represented by Philip Gaddy

 
Last updated: October 26, 2010