Denied

No. 10-252

Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. South Florida Water Management District, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

See other cases from the Eleventh Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. (orders list)

Supplemental brief of respondents South Florida Water Management District, and Carol Wehle filed. VIDED. (Distributed)

Reply of petitioner Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida filed. (Distributed)

Supplemental brief of respondent United States Sugar Corporation filed. VIDED. (Distributed)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 23, 2010.

Supplemental brief of respondent United States Sugar Corporation filed. VIDED. (Distributed) TBP

Brief amicus curiae of Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services filed. VIDED.

Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. VIDED.

Brief of respondent United States Sugar Corporation in opposition filed. VIDED.

Brief of respondents South Florida Water Management District, and Carol Wehle in opposition filed. VIDED.

Brief amici curiae of Colorado, et al. filed. VIDED.

Brief amici curiae of City and County of Denver Acting by and through Its Board of Water Commissioners, et al. filed. VIDED.

Brief amicus curiae of City of New York filed. VIDED. (Distributed)

Order extending time to file response to petition to and including October 22, 2010, for all respondents.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 22, 2010)

Application (10A121) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until August 19, 2010.

Application (10A121) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 5, 2010 to August 19, 2010, submitted to Justice Thomas.

Parties

Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, Petitioner, represented by Sonia Escobio O'Donnell

Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, Petitioner, represented by Sonia Escobio O''Donnell

South Florida Water Management District, and Carol Wehle, Respondent, represented by James E. Nutt

United States, Respondent, represented by Neal Kumar Katyal

United States Sugar Corporation, Respondent, represented by Timothy S. Bishop

Amici Curiae

City and County of Denver Acting by and through Its Board of Water Commissioners, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Peter D. Nichols

City of New York, Amicus Curiae, represented by Leonard J. Koerner

Colorado, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Daniel D. Domenico

Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Amicus Curiae, represented by John W. Costigan

 
Last updated: December 1, 2010