from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
See other cases from the Eleventh Circuit.
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Chafin v. Chafin, 568 U. S. ___ (2013).
Supplemental brief of petitioner John K. Peterson filed. (Distributed)
Reply of petitioner John K. Peterson filed. (Distributed)
Brief of respondent Pandita Joy-Charm Seaman in opposition filed.
Order extending time to file response to petition to and including June 12, 2012.
Response Requested . (Due June 1, 2012)
Petitioner complied with order of March 26, 2012.
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until April 16, 2012, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court. (orders list)
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 21, 2012)
John K. Peterson, Petitioner, pro se
Pandita Joy-Charm Seaman, Respondent, represented by A. James Rockefeller