Denied

No. 11-8802

Peter N. Akaoma v. Supershuttle International Corporation, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

See other cases from the Fourth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 24, 2012.

Petitioner complied with order of April 16, 2012.

Application (11A1011) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until August 5, 2012. No further extensions will be granted.

Application (11A1011) for a further extension of time within which to comply with the order of April 16, 2012, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED. (orders list)

Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 17, 2012.

Application (11A1011) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until June 6, 2012.

Application (11A1011) for an extension of time within which to comply with the order of April 16, 2012, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until May 7, 2012, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court. (orders list)

Reply of petitioner Peter N. Akaoma filed. (Distributed)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 13, 2012.

Brief of respondents Supershuttle International Corporation, et al. in opposition filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 15, 2012)

Application (11A564) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 10, 2012.

Application (11A564) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 12, 2011 to February 10, 2012, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Parties

Peter N. Akaoma, Petitioner, pro se

Supershuttle International Corporation, et al., Respondent, represented by Ralph Edward Kipp

 
Last updated: February 16, 2016