The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus/prohibition is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
Supplemental brief of petitioner filed. (Distributed)
Waiver of right of respondents Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., John Stumpf and Jason Oujiri to respond filed.
Motion (12M117) of petitioner for leave to proceed as a veteran Denied.
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 26, 2013)
Motion (12M117) of petitioner for leave to proceed as a veteran filed.
Party name:, Petitioner, represented by Johnny Traylor
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., John Stumpf and Jason Oujiri, Respondent, represented by Joshua Tropper