Decided

No. 12-1163

Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

See other cases from the Federal Circuit.

Docket Entries

Record returned for U.S.D.C. Northern District of Texas (Fort Worth Division)

Record returned for U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit.

JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.

Argued. For petitioner: Neal K. Katyal, Washington, D. C.; and Brian H. Fletcher, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Donald R. Dunner, Washington, D. C.

Reply of petitioner Highmark Inc. filed. (Distributed)

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.

Brief amicus curiae of Boston Patent Law Association. filed. (Distributed)

Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Owners Association filed. (Distributed)

Brief amicus curiae of BSA l The Software Alliance filed. (Distributed)

Brief of respondent Allcare Health Management System, Inc. filed. (Distributed)

Record received from U.S.D.C. Northern District of Texas (Fort Worth). (7 Boxes), (2 CD's) All records in the 7 boxes are SEALED. The 2 CD's are electronic.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.

CIRCULATED.

Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent. VIDED.

Brief amici curiae of Google Inc., et al. filed. VIDED (see 12-1184).

Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed.

Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.

Brief amicus curiae of New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Apple Inc. in support of neither party filed. VIDED (see 12-1184).

Brief amici curiae of Yahoo! Inc., et al filed. VIDED (see 12-1184).

Brief amicus curiae of Blue Cross Blue Shield Association filed.

Record received from U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit. (1 Box)

Joint appendix filed (2 volumes and supplemental volume). (Statement of costs received)

Brief of petitioner Highmark Inc. filed.

SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.

The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including December 2, 2013.

The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including January 17, 2014.

Petition GRANTED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 30, 2013.

Reply of petitioner Highmark Inc. filed.

Brief of respondent Allcare Health Management Systems, Inc. in opposition filed.

Response Requested . (Due June 13, 2013)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 23, 2013.

Brief amicus curiae of Blue Cross Blue Shield Association filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 24, 2013)

Application (12A763) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until April 5, 2013.

Application (12A763) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 6, 2013 to April 5, 2013, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Parties

Highmark Inc., Petitioner, represented by Neal Kumar Katyal

Allcare Health Management System, Inc., Respondent, represented by Donald R. Dunner

Amici Curiae

American Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party, Amicus Curiae, represented by Barbara A. Fiacco

Apple Inc. in support of neither party, Amicus Curiae, represented by Mark S. Davies

Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Brian Himanshu Pandya

Boston Patent Law Association., Amicus Curiae, represented by Erik Paul Belt

BSA l The Software Alliance, Amicus Curiae, represented by Andrew J. Pincus

Google Inc., et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Paul D. Clement

Intellectual Property Owners Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Paul H. Berghoff

New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party, Amicus Curiae, represented by Charles R. Macedo

the United States, Amicus Curiae, represented by Donald B. Verrilli Jr.

United States, Amicus Curiae, represented by Brian Halligan Fletcher

Yahoo! Inc., et al, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jeffrey A. Lamken

 
Last updated: February 16, 2016