Decided

No. 12-1184

Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

See other cases from the Federal Circuit.

Docket Entries

Record returned for U.S.D.C. District of Minnesota.

Record returned for U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit.

JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, and Kagan, JJ., joined, and in which Scalia, J., joined except as to footnotes 1-3.

Argued. For petitioner: Rudolph A. Telscher, Jr., St. Louis, Mo.; and Roman Martinez, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Carter G. Phillips, Washington, D. C.

Reply of petitioner Octane Fitness, LLC filed. (Distributed)

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.

Brief of respondent ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. filed. (Distributed)

CIRCULATED.

Motion to file the joint appendix under seal with redacted copies for the public record GRANTED.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.

Record received from U.S.D.C. District of Minnesota (1 Box) The record is SEALED. Record also received from U.S.D.C. District of Minnesota (1 Envelope).

Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 10, 2014.

Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.

Brief amicus curiae of BSA - The Software Alliance filed.

Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed.

Brief amici curiae of Google Inc., et al. filed. VIDED (see 12-1163).

Brief amicus curiae of Apple Inc. in support of neither party filed. VIDED (see 12-1163).

Brief amici curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation, et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Food Marketing Institute filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Owners Association filed.

Brief amici curiae of Computer & Communications Industry Association, et al. filed.

Brief amici curiae of Vermont, et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago in support of neither party filed.

Brief amicus curiae of New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed.

Brief amici curiae of 3M Co., et al filed.

Brief amici curiae of Yahoo! Inc., et al. filed. VIDED.

Brief amici curiae of Robin Feldman, and U.C. Hastings Institute for Innovation Law in support of either party filed.

Record received from U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit. (1 Box)

Motion to file the joint appendix under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed by petitioner Octane Fitness, LLC.

Brief of petitioner Octane Fitness, LLC filed.

Joint appendix filed. (Redacted copy)

SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, February 26, 2014

The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including January 17, 2014.

The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including December 2, 2013.

Blanket consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the respondent.

Petition GRANTED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 30, 2013.

Reply of petitioner Octane Fitness, LLC filed. (Distributed)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 20, 2013.

Brief of respondent ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. in opposition filed.

Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 29, 2013.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 29, 2013)

Parties

Octane Fitness, LLC, Petitioner, represented by Rudolph A. Telscher Jr.

Octane Fitness, LLC, Petitioner, represented by Kara R. Fussner

ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., Respondent, represented by Larry R. Laycock

ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., Respondent, represented by Carter G. Phillips

Amici Curiae

3M Co., et al, Amicus Curiae, represented by Pratik A. Shah

American Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party, Amicus Curiae, represented by Barbara A. Fiacco

Apple Inc. in support of neither party, Amicus Curiae, represented by Mark S. Davies

BSA - The Software Alliance, Amicus Curiae, represented by Andrew J. Pincus

Computer & Communications Industry Association, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Mark Lemley

Electronic Frontier Foundation, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Julie P. Samuels

Food Marketing Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by David A. Balto

Google Inc., et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Paul D. Clement

Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago in support of neither party, Amicus Curiae, represented by John M. Augustyn

Intellectual Property Owners Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Paul H. Berghoff

New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party, Amicus Curiae, represented by Charles R. Macedo

Robin Feldman and U.C. Hastings Institute for Innovation Law, Amicus Curiae, represented by Robin C. Feldman

United States, Amicus Curiae, represented by Donald B. Verrilli Jr.

United States, Amicus Curiae, represented by Roman Martinez V.

Vermont, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Bridget C. Asay

Yahoo! Inc., et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Jeffrey A. Lamken

 
Last updated: February 16, 2016