from the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District
See other cases from California.
MANDATE ISSUED.
Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Breyer, and Alito, JJ., joined. Scalia, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined.
Argued. For petitioners: Paul R. Kleven, Berkeley, Cal. (Appointed by this Court.) For respondent: Jeffrey M. K. Laurence, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, San Francisco, Cal.; and Rachel P. Kovner, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)
Reply of petitioners Lorenzo Prado Navarette and Jose Prado Navarette filed. (Distributed)
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
Record Received from U.S.C.A. 1st Appellate District. The record is electronic (Not on PACER).
Brief amici curiae of Florida, 31 Other States, and the District of Columbia filed. (Distributed)
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed. (Distributed)
Brief of respondent California filed. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed. (Distributed)
CIRCULATED.
Brief of petitioners Lorenzo Prado Navarette and Jose Prado Navarette filed.
Joint appendix filed.
SET FOR ARGUMENT Tuesday, January 21, 2014.
Motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis GRANTED.
Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioners GRANTED. Paul Kleven, Esquire, of Berkeley, California, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioners in this case.
Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioners Lorenzo Prado Navarette and Jose Prado Navarette.
Motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis filed by petitioners Lorenzo Prado Navarette and Jose Prado Navarette.
Petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
Reply of petitioners Lorenzo Prado Navarette and Jose Prado Navarette filed.
Brief of respondent California in opposition filed.
Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 12, 2013.
Response Requested . (Due July 11, 2013)
Petitioners complied with order of May 13, 2013.
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until June 3, 2013, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 1, 2013)
Lorenzo Prado Navarette and Jose Prado Navarette, Petitioner, represented by Paul R. Kleven
California, Respondent, represented by Jeffrey M. Laurence
Florida, 31 Other States, and the District of Columbia, Amicus Curiae, represented by Pamela Jo Bondi
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Daniel R. Ortiz
the United States, Amicus Curiae, represented by Donald B. Verrilli Jr.
United States, Amicus Curiae, represented by Rachel Peter Kovner