from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
See other cases from Virginia.
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Record (1-box) returned to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division.
Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Scalia, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, J., joined. Alito, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas, J., joined.
Argued. For petitioner: E. Joshua Rosenkranz, New York, N. Y.; and Michael R. Dreeben, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Thomas C. Goldstein, Bethesda, Md.
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
Reply of petitioner City of Los Angeles, California filed. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of Gun Owners of America, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
Brief amicus curiae of United States Chamber of Commerce filed. (Distributed)
Brief amicus curiae of Asian American Hotel Owners Association filed. (Distributed)
Brief amicus curiae of Google Inc. filed. (Distributed)
Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed. (Distributed)
Brief amicus curiae of The Rutherford Institute filed. (Distributed)
Brief amicus curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation filed. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), et al. filed. (Distributed)
Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Justice filed. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of Professors Adam Lamparello and Charles E. MacLean filed. (Distributed)
Brief of respondents Naranjibhai Patel, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
CIRCULATED.
Record received from U.S.D.C. Central Dist. of California Western Division. (1 - Box)
Record from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.
Brief amici curiae of National League of Cities, et al., filed.
SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, March 3, 2015
Brief amicus curiae of Manhattan Institute for Policy Research filed.
Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
Brief amici curiae of California, et al. filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Love146 in support of neither party filed.
Brief amici curiae of Drug Free America Foundation, Inc., et al. filed.
Record requested from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.
Brief amici curiae of County of Los Angeles, et al. filed.
Brief amici curiae of California State Sheriffs' Association, et al. filed.
Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)
Brief of petitioner City of Los Angeles, California filed.
Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.
Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.
The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including January 23, 2015.
The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including December 15, 2014.
Petition GRANTED.
Letter from counsel for the respondents received. (Distributed)
Letter from counsel for the petitioner received. (Distributed)
Reply of petitioner City of Los Angeles, California filed.
Brief of respondents Naranjibhai Patel, et al. in opposition filed.
Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including August 18, 2014.
Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 18, 2014.
Response Requested . (Due June 18, 2014)
Waiver of right of respondents Naranjibhai Patel, et al. to respond filed.
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 28, 2014)
City of Los Angeles, California, Petitioner, represented by Gregory Paul Orland
City of Los Angeles, California, Petitioner, represented by E. Joshua Rosenkranz
Naranjibhai Patel, et al., Respondent, represented by Frank A. Weiser
Naranjibhai Patel, et al., Respondent, represented by Thomas C. Goldstein
Asian American Hotel Owners Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Onkar N. Sharma
California, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Andrea Natasha Cortina
California State Sheriffs' Association, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Martin J. Mayer
City of Los Angeles, California v. Naranjibhai Patel, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz
County of Los Angeles, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Timothy T. Coates
Drug Free America Foundation, Inc., et al, Amicus Curiae, represented by Orly Degani
Electronic Frontier Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Tze Lee Tien
Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Marc Rotenberg
Google Inc., Amicus Curiae, represented by Eric D. Miller
Gun Owners of America, Inc., et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Herbert W. Titus
Institute for Justice, Amicus Curiae, represented by Anthony B. Sanders
Love146 in support of neithr party, Amicus Curiae, represented by Amanda Rose Parker
National League of Cities, et al.,, Amicus Curiae, represented by Thomas R. McCarthy
Professors Adam Lamparello and Charles E. MacLean, Amicus Curiae, represented by James J. Berles
The Cato Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by James W. Harper
The Rutherford Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Anand Agneshwar
United States, Amicus Curiae, represented by Donald B. Verrilli Jr.
United States, Amicus Curiae, represented by Michael R. Dreeben
United States Chamber of Commerce, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jessica Ring Amunson