from the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One
See other cases from California.
MANDATE ISSUED.
Record returned for Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One.
Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. VIDED with No. 13-212.
Argued. For petitioner: Jeffrey L. Fisher, Stanford, Cal. For respondent: Edward C. DuMont, Solicitor General, San Francisco, Cal.; and Michael R. Dreeben, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)
Reply of petitioner David Leon Riley filed. (Distributed)
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of Arizona, et al. filed. (Reprinted) (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of Association of State Criminal Investigative Agencies, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Brief of respondent California filed. (Distributed)
CIRCULATED.
Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center in support of Riley and Wurie filed. VIDED.
Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of Center for Democracy & Technology, and Electronic Frontier Foundation in support of Riley and Wurie filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of American Library Assciation, and The Internet Archive in support of Riley and Wurie filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of Professors Charles E. MacLean & Adam Lamparello filed. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of National Press Photographers Association, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of Electronic Privacy Information Center, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Brief amicus curiae of DKT Liberty Project filed. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of Criminal Law Professors in support of private parties filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)
Brief of petitioner David Leon Riley filed.
Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, rece8ved from counsel for the respondent.
Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.
SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, April 29, 2014
Petition GRANTED limited to the following question: Whether evidence admitted at petitioner's trial was obtained in a search of petitioner's cell phone that violated petitioner's Fourth Amendment rights.
Record received. California Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District and San Diego Superior Court (1 box)
Record Requested .
Reply of petitioner David Leon Riley filed.
Brief of respondent California in opposition filed.
Response Requested . (Due October 3, 2013)
Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed.
Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.
Brief amici curiae of Center for Democracy & Technology and Electronic Frontier Foundation filed. (Distributed)
Consent to the filing of amicus curae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 30, 2013)
David Leon Riley, Petitioner, represented by Jeffrey L. Fisher
California, Respondent, represented by Christine M. L. Bergman
California, Respondent, represented by Edward Carroll DuMont
American Civil Liberties Union, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Susan N. Herman
American Library Assciation, and The Internet Archive, Amicus Curiae, represented by William M. Jay
Arizona, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Michael T. O'Toole
Association of State Criminal Investigative Agencies, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Gaetan Gerville-Reache
Center for Democracy & Technology, and Electronic Frontier Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Andrew J. Pincus
Constitutional Accountability Center, Amicus Curiae, represented by Elizabeth B. Wydra
Criminal Law Professors in support of private parties, Amicus Curiae, represented by Tillman J. Breckenridge
DKT Liberty Project, Amicus Curiae, represented by Donald B. Mitchell Jr.
Electronic Privacy Information Center, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Marc Rotenberg
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amicus Curiae, represented by Bronson D. James
National Press Photographers Association, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Robert L. Corn-Revere
Professors Charles E. MacLean & Adam Lamparello, Amicus Curiae, represented by James J. Berles
The Cato Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by James W. Harper
United States, Amicus Curiae, represented by Donald B. Verrilli Jr.
United States, Amicus Curiae, represented by Michael R. Dreeben