from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
See other cases from the First Circuit.
Record returned for U.S.C.A. for First Circuit.
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. VIDED with No. 13-132.
Argued. For petitioner: Michael R. Dreeben, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Judith H. Mizner, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Boston, Mass.
Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of National Association of Federal Defenders, et al., filed. (Distributed).
Brief amicus curiae of The Rutherford Institute filed. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of Southwestern Law Student Anna Aran, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of Downsize DC Foundation, et al., filed. (Distributed).
Brief of respondent Brima Wurie filed. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of American Library Association, and The Internet Archive in support of Riley and Wurie filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center in support of Riley and Wurie filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of Center for Democracy & Technology, and Electronic Frontier Foundation in support of Riley and Wurie filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of Professors Charles E. MacLean & Adam Lamparello filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of National Press Photographers Association, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
CIRCULATED.
Brief amici curiae of Criminal Law Professors in support of private parties filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.
Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from the respondent.
Joint appendix filed.
Brief of petitioner United States filed.
Record received from U.S.C.A. 1st Circuit, (1 envelope) part of this record is SEALED. All other filings of this record is available electronically through PACER.
SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, April 29, 2014
Petition GRANTED.
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)
Brief of respondent Brima Wurie in opposition filed.
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Brima Wurie.
Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including November 15, 2013.
Order extending time to file response to petition to and including October 16, 2013.
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 16, 2013)
United States, Petitioner, represented by Donald B. Verrilli Jr.
United States, Petitioner, represented by Michael R. Dreeben
Brima Wurie, Respondent, represented by Judith H. Mizner
American Library Association, and The Internet Archive in support of Riley and Wurie, Amicus Curiae, represented by William M. Jay
Cato Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by James W. Harper
Center for Democracy & Technology, and Electronic Frontier Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Andrew J. Pincus
Constitutional Accountability Center Constitutional Accountability Center, Amicus Curiae, represented by Elizabeth B. Wydra
Criminal Law Professors in support of private parties, Amicus Curiae, represented by Tillman J. Breckenridge
Downsize DC Foundation, et al.,, Amicus Curiae, represented by Herbert W. Titus
National Association of Federal Defenders, et al.,, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jeffrey T. Green
National Press Photographers Association, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Robert L. Corn-Revere
Professors Charles E. MacLean & Adam Lamparello, Amicus Curiae, represented by James J. Berles
Southwestern Law Student Anna Aran, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Michael M. Epstein
The Rutherford Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Anand Agneshwar