from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
See other cases from the Federal Circuit.
Record Returned for U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York.
Judgment issued.
Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Argued. For petitioner: John D. Vandenberg, Portland, Ore. For respondent: Mark D. Harris, New York, N. Y.; and Curtis E. Gannon, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
Reply of petitioner Nautilus, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Interval Licensing LLC filed. (Distributed)
Brief amicus curiae of Biotechnology Industry Organization filed. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae of Nokia Corporation and Nokia USA Inc. filed. (Distributed)
Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed. (Distributed)
Brief of respondent Biosig Instruments, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Ananda M. Chakrabarty Ph.D. GRANTED.
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Ananda M. Chakrabarty Ph.D.
CIRCULATED.
Brief amici curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation and Public Knowledge filed.
Brief amici curiae of Amazon.Com, Inc., et al. filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Sigram Schindler Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH in support of neither party filed.
Brief amicus curiae of The Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago in support of neither party filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Yahoo! Inc. filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Professor S. Menell in support of neither party filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Microsoft Corporation filed.
Brief amicus curiae of American Bar Association in support of neither party filed.
Brief amici curiae of Nova Chemicals Inc., et al. filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Owners Association in support of neither party filed.
Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed.
Brief amicus curiae of AARP filed.
Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent.
Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.
Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
Brief of petitioner Nautilus, Inc. filed.
Record received from U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.
Record received from U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York is Electronic and located on PACER. Record also received on 02/21/2014,(1 Envelope). Part of this record is SEALED and also have 1 Exhibit filed electronically (Not PACER).
SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, April 28, 2014
Petition GRANTED.
Reply of petitioner Nautilus, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
Brief of respondent Biosig Instruments, Inc. in opposition filed.
Brief amici curiae of Amazon.Com, Inc., et al. filed.
Brief amici curiae of Public Knowledge, and The Electronic Frontier Foundation filed.
Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 22, 2013.
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 23, 2013)
Consent to the filing of amicus cuirae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petiioner.
Nautilus, Inc., Petitioner, represented by John D. Vandenberg
Biosig Instruments, Inc., Respondent, represented by Michael James Bonella
Biosig Instruments, Inc., Respondent, represented by Mark D. Harris
Biosig Instruments, Inc. in support of neither party, Respondent, represented by Daniel C. Mulveny
AARP, Amicus Curiae, represented by Barbara A. Jones
Amazon.Com, Inc., et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by John Thorne
American Bar Association in support of neither party, Amicus Curiae, represented by James R. Silkenat
American Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party, Amicus Curiae, represented by J. Campbell Barker
Ananda M. Chakrabarty Ph.D., Amicus Curiae, represented by Justin Michael Barnes
Biotechnology Industry Organization, Amicus Curiae, represented by Richard P. Bress
Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Public Knowledge, Amicus Curiae, represented by Daniel K. Nazer
Intellectual Property Owners Association in support of neither party, Amicus Curiae, represented by Paul H. Berghoff
Interval Licensing LLC, Amicus Curiae, represented by Thomas C. Goldstein
Microsoft Corporation, Amicus Curiae, represented by E. Joshua Rosenkranz
Nokia Corporation and Nokia USA Inc., Amicus Curiae, represented by Patrick J. Flinn
Nova Chemicals Inc., et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Seth P. Waxman
Professor S. Menell in support of neither party, Amicus Curiae, represented by Peter S. Menell
Sigram Schindler Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH in support of neither party, Amicus Curiae, represented by Chidambaram S. Iyer
The Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago in support of neither party, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jeffrey Brandon Burgan
the United States, Amicus Curiae, represented by Donald B. Verrilli Jr.
United States, Amicus Curiae, represented by Curtis E. Gannon
Yahoo! Inc., Amicus Curiae, represented by Jeffrey A. Lamken