Rehearing Disposed

No. 13-7046

Daniel David Dydzak v. United States District Court for the Central District of California

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.

Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 21, 2014.

Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 10, 2014.

Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 22, 2013)

Parties

Daniel David Dydzak, Petitioner, pro se

 
Last updated: February 16, 2016