Distributed

No. 14-1019

Arizona v. Ashton Company Incorporated Contractors and Engineers, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015.

Rescheduled.

Reply of petitioner Arizona filed. VIDED. (Distributed)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 25, 2015.

Reply of petitioners ABB Inc., et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)

Letter dated June 5, 2015, received from counsel for petitioner waiving 14-day waiting period for the filing of a reply pursuant to Rule 15.5.

Brief of respondents Pima County; Raytheon Company; Tomkins Industries, Inc.; Tucson Airport Authority; and Tucson Electric Company in opposition filed. VIDED.

Application (14A1185) to file a consolidated response to petition for a writ of certiorari in excess of word limits granted by Justice Kennedy. The consolidated response may not exceed 12,000 words.

Application (14A1185) of respondents Pima County, Raytheon Company, Tomkins Industries, Inc., Tucson Airport Authority, and Tucson Electric Power Company to file consolidated response to petition for a writ of certiorari in excess of word limits, submitted to Justice Kennedy.

Order extending time to file response to petition to and including June 1, 2015, for all respondents.

Letter dated April 23, 2015, from counsel of record for General Dynamics Corporation received.

Response Requested . (Due May 18, 2015)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 24, 2015.

Brief amici curiae of State of Colorado, et al. filed.

Waiver of right of respondent General Dynamics Corporation to respond filed.

Waiver of right of respondent Tomkins Industries, Inc. to respond filed.

Waiver of right of respondent Tucson Electric Power Company to respond filed.

Waiver of right of respondent Raytheon Company to respond filed. VIDED.

Waiver of right of respondent Tucson Airport Authority to respond filed.

Waiver of right of respondent Pima County to respond filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 23, 2015)

Parties

ABB Inc., et al., Petitioner, represented by Christopher D. Thomas

Arizona, Petitioner, represented by Jeffrey Cantrell

General Dynamics Corporation, Respondent, represented by Gabrielle Sigel

Pima County, Respondent, represented by Michael LeBlanc

Pima County; Raytheon Company; Tomkins Industries, Inc.; Tucson Airport Authority; and Tucson Electric Company, Respondent, represented by Jennifer B. Anderson

Raytheon Company, Respondent, represented by Robert M. Jackson

Tomkins Industries, Inc., Respondent, represented by Kevin Neal

Tucson Airport Authority, Respondent, represented by James F. Murphy

Tucson Electric Power Company, Respondent, represented by Matthew Joy

Amici Curiae

The States of Colorado, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Frederick R. Yarger

 
Last updated: February 16, 2016