from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.
Rescheduled.
Reply of petitioner Arizona filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Reply of petitioners ABB Inc., et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Letter dated June 5, 2015, received from counsel for petitioner waiving 14-day waiting period for the filing of a reply pursuant to Rule 15.5.
Brief of respondents Pima County; Raytheon Company; Tomkins Industries, Inc.; Tucson Airport Authority; and Tucson Electric Company in opposition filed. VIDED.
Application (14A1185) to file a consolidated response to petition for a writ of certiorari in excess of word limits granted by Justice Kennedy. The consolidated response may not exceed 12,000 words.
Application (14A1185) of respondents Pima County, Raytheon Company, Tomkins Industries, Inc., Tucson Airport Authority, and Tucson Electric Power Company to file consolidated response to petition for a writ of certiorari in excess of word limits, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Order extending time to file response to petition to and including June 1, 2015, for all respondents.
Letter dated April 23, 2015, from counsel of record for General Dynamics Corporation received.
Response Requested . (Due May 18, 2015)
Brief amici curiae of State of Colorado, et al. filed.
Waiver of right of respondent General Dynamics Corporation to respond filed.
Waiver of right of respondent Tomkins Industries, Inc. to respond filed.
Waiver of right of respondent Tucson Electric Power Company to respond filed.
Waiver of right of respondent Raytheon Company to respond filed. VIDED.
Waiver of right of respondent Tucson Airport Authority to respond filed.
Waiver of right of respondent Pima County to respond filed.
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 23, 2015)
ABB Inc., et al., Petitioner, represented by Christopher D. Thomas
Arizona, Petitioner, represented by Jeffrey Cantrell
General Dynamics Corporation, Respondent, represented by Gabrielle Sigel
Pima County, Respondent, represented by Michael LeBlanc
Pima County; Raytheon Company; Tomkins Industries, Inc.; Tucson Airport Authority; and Tucson Electric Company, Respondent, represented by Jennifer B. Anderson
Raytheon Company, Respondent, represented by Robert M. Jackson
Tomkins Industries, Inc., Respondent, represented by Kevin Neal
Tucson Airport Authority, Respondent, represented by James F. Murphy
Tucson Electric Power Company, Respondent, represented by Matthew Joy
The States of Colorado, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Frederick R. Yarger