Decided

No. 14-824

Raymond Curtis Carp v. Michigan

from the Supreme Court of Michigan

See other cases from Michigan.

Docket Entries

JUDGMENT ISSUED

MANDATE ISSUED

Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U. S. ___ (2016). Justice Thomas, with whom Justice Alito joins, concurring in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand in this case: The Court has held the petition in this and many other cases pending the decision in Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U. S. ___ (2016). In holding this petition and now vacating and remanding the judgment below, the Court has not assessed whether petitioner�s asserted entitlement to retroactive relief �is properly presented in the case.� Id., at ___ (slip op., at 13). On remand, courts should understand that the Court�s disposition of this petition does not reflect any view regarding petitioner�s entitlement to relief. The Court�s disposition does not, for example, address whether an adequate and independent state ground bars relief, whether petitioner forfeited or waived any entitlement to relief (by, for example, entering into a plea agreement waiving ...

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 4, 2016.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 19, 2016.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 1, 2015.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 24, 2015.

Reply of petitioner Raymond Curtis Carp filed.

Brief of respondent Michigan in opposition filed.

Response Requested . (Due March 23, 2015)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 6, 2015.

Waiver of right of respondent Michigan to respond filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 12, 2015)

Parties

Raymond Curtis Carp, Petitioner, represented by Patricia L. Selby

Michigan, Respondent, represented by Hilary B. Georgia

 
Last updated: April 18, 2017