Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus/prohibition is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
Waiver of right of respondent to respond filed.
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 27, 2015)
Party name:, Petitioner, represented by Arturo Solis
Federal Respondent, Respondent, represented by Donald B. Verrilli Jr.