Decided

No. 16-1003

Matthew McKnight, et al. v. Steven O. Petersen, on Behalf of L. P., a Minor and Beneficiary and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Steven V. Petersen

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of White v. Pauly, 580 U. S. ____ (2017) (per curiam).

Reply of petitioners Matthew McKnight, et al. filed. (Distributed)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 8, 2017.

Brief of respondent Steven O. Peterson, on Behalf of L. P., a Minor and Beneficiary and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Steven V. Peterson in opposition filed.

Response Requested . (Due May 12, 2017)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 21, 2017.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 20, 2017)

Parties

Matthew McKnight, et al., Petitioner, represented by Michael A. Patterson

Steven O. Peterson, on Behalf of L. P., a Minor and Beneficiary and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Steven V. Peterson, Respondent, represented by Philip Albert Talmadge

Steven O. Peterson, on Behalf of L. P., a Minor and Beneficiary and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Steven V. Peterson, Respondent, represented by John Robert Connelly Jr.

 
Last updated: November 21, 2024