Decided

No. 17-1702

Manhattan Community Access Corporation, et al. v. DeeDee Halleck, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

See other cases from the Second Circuit.

Docket Entries

JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Adjudged to be REVERSED IN PART and case REMANDED. Kavanaugh, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg, Breyer, and Kagan, JJ., joined.

Argued. For petitioners: Michael B. de Leeuw, New York, N. Y. For respondents: Paul W. Hughes, Washington, D. C.

Reply of petitioners Manhattan Community Access Corporation, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of New York County Lawyers Association filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, AND NATIONAL COALITION AGAINST CENSORSHIP, filed. (Distributed)

Brief amicus curiae of National Police Accountability Project filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of The Alliance for Community Media, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Brief amicus curiae of Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University filed. (Distributed)

CIRCULATED

Record request from the U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit is electronic.

Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit.

Brief of respondents DeeDee Halleck, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Brief amicus curiae of NCTA – The Internet & Television Association in support of neither party filed.

Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation and TechFreedom filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation in support of neither party filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Chicago Access Corporation filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America in support of neither party filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Internet Association in support of neither party filed.

Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.

Brief of petitioners Manhattan Community Access Corporation, et al. filed.

Joint appendix filed.

Joint motion of the parties to file the brief on the merits is granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including December 4, 2018. The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including January 11, 2019. The reply brief is to be filed in compliance with Rule 25.3.

Joint supplement to motion for extension of time filed.

Joint motion of the parties for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.

Petition GRANTED.

Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Chicago Access Corporation GRANTED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 25, 2018 to August 24, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 24, 2018.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 25, 2018)

Parties

Manhattan Community Access Corporation, et al., Petitioner, represented by Michael B. de Leeuw

DEEDEE HALLECK, et al., Respondent, represented by Paul Whitfield Hughes

Amici Curiae

Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Amicus Curiae, represented by Catherine Emily Stetson

Electronic Frontier Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by David Allen Greene

Internet Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Chad Ian Golder

Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, Amicus Curiae, represented by Katherine A. Fallow

NCTA – The Internet & Television Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Howard Jeffrey Symons

New York County Lawyers Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Carolyn A. Kubitschek

Pacific Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by James M. Manley

 
Last updated: August 18, 2019