from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
See other cases from the Fourth Circuit.
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Breyer, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Gorsuch, J., joined. Kavanaugh, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch, JJ., joined.
Argued. For petitioners: Carter G. Phillips, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Glenn L. Hara, Rolling Meadows, Ill.; and Rachel P. Kovner, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)
Reply of petitioners PDR Network, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit.
Corrected Certificate of Compliance from the Electronic Privacy Information Center filed. (2/19/2019)
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
Brief amici curiae of American Bankers Association, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Brief amicus curiae of Electronic Privacy Information Center filed. (Distributed)
Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed)
CIRCULATED
Brief of respondent Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc. filed.
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, March 25, 2019
Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners GRANTED.
Brief amici curiae of State of Oklahoma, et al. filed.
Brief amicus curiae of U.S. Chamber of Commerce in support of neither party filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Aditya Bamzai filed.
Brief amici curiae of State and Local Government Associations filed.
Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners PDR Network, LLC, et al.
Brief of petitioners PDR Network, LLC, et al. filed.
Motion to extend the time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits granted and the time is extended to and including January 8, 2019.
Motion for an extension of time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits filed.
Petition GRANTED limited to the following question: Whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the FCC's legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
Reply of petitioners PDR Network, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Waiver of right of respondent Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc. to respond filed.
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 26, 2018)
PDR Network, LLC, et al., Petitioner, represented by Carter G. Phillips
PDR Network, LLC, et al., Petitioner, represented by Jeffrey Neal Rosenthal
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc., Respondent, represented by Glenn L. Hara
Aditya Bamzai, Amicus Curiae, represented by Aditya Bamzai
American Bankers Association, Consumer Bankers Association, Independent Community Bankers of America, Amicus Curiae, represented by Charles H. Kennedy
Electronic Privacy Information Center, Amicus Curiae, represented by Marc Rotenberg
State and Local Government Associations, Amicus Curiae, represented by Ashley Elizabeth Johnson
State of Oklahoma, Amicus Curiae, represented by Mithun Mansinghani
UNITED STATES, Amicus Curiae, represented by Noel J. Francisco
U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, Amicus Curiae, represented by Megan L. Brown