Argued

No. 17-204

Apple Inc. v. Robert Pepper, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Argued. For petitioner: Daniel M. Wall, San Francisco, Cal.; and Noel J. Francisco, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae). For respondents: David C. Frederick, Washington, D. C.

Reply of petitioner Apple Inc. filed. (Distributed)

CIRCULATED

Application (18A399) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file petitioner's reply brief on the merits to and including October 29, 2018.

Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.

Application (18A399) to extend the time to file a reply brief from October 24, 2018 to October 29, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.

SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, November 26, 2018

Brief amici curiae of Antitrust Scholars filed.

Brief amicus curiae of American Antitrust Institute filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Open Markets Institute filed.

Brief amici curiae of Texas, Iowa, and 29 Other States filed.

Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Apple Inc..

Brief of respondents Robert Pepper, et al. filed.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.

Brief amicus curiae of ACT The App Association filed.

Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Computer & Communications Industry Association filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.

Brief amicus curiae of R Street Institute filed.

Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs received.)

Brief of petitioner Apple Inc. filed.

Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Robert Pepper, et al.

Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 10, 2018. The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including September 24, 2018.

Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.

Petition GRANTED.

Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Washington Legal Foundation GRANTED.

Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by ACT The App Association GRANTED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/14/2018.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/7/2018.

The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.

Reply of petitioner Apple Inc. filed. (Distributed)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2017.

Objection to motions of the App Association and the Washington Legal Foundation to fie briefs in support of petitioner from respondents Robert Pepper, et al. filed.

Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by ACT The App Association.

Brief of respondents Robert Pepper, et al. in opposition filed.

Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Washington Legal Foundation.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 6, 2017)

Parties

Apple Inc., Petitioner, represented by Daniel M. Wall

Amici Curiae

ACT The App Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Brian Eugene Scarpelli

BSA | The Software Alliance, Amicus Curiae, represented by Andrew John Pincus

Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Amicus Curiae, represented by Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.

Computer & Communications Industry Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Beth Susan Brinkmann

R Street Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Charles Duan

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., Amicus Curiae, represented by Thomas Ryan McCarthy

Washington Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Cory L. Andrews

 
Last updated: December 17, 2018