Argued

No. 17-646

Terance Martez Gamble v. United States

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

See other cases from the Eleventh Circuit.

Docket Entries

Argued. For petitioner: Louis A. Chaiten, Cleveland, Ohio. For respondent: Eric J. Feigin, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For Texas, et al., as amici curiae: Kyle D. Hawkins, Texas Solicitor General, Austin, Tex.

RESCHEDULED FOR ARGUMENT ON Thursday, December 6, 2018

Reply of petitioner Terance Gamble filed. (Distributed)

Reply of Terance Gamble submitted.

Letter of United States submitted.

Letter of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)

Motion of Texas, et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae and for enlargement of time for oral argument is NTED and the time is allotted as follows: 40 minutes for the petitioner, 30 minutes for the respondent, and 10 minutes for Texas, et al.

Motion of Texas, et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae and for enlargement of time for oral argument is GRANTED and the time is allotted as follows: 40 minutes for the petitioner, 30 minutes for the respondent, and 10 minutes for Texas, et al.

Response of United States to motion submitted.

Reply of Texas, et al. in support of motion, filed.

Response of respondent to motion of Texas, et al., filed.

Motion of Texas, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin for leave to participate in oral argument and for divided argument submitted.

Response of Terance Gamble to motion submitted.

Opposition of petitioner to motion of Texas, et al., filed.

Amicus brief of Texas, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin submitted.

Motion for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae and for enlargement of time for oral argument filed by Texas, et al.

Amicus brief of National Association of Counties, National League of Cities, United States Conference of Mayors, International City/County Management Association, International Municipal Lawyers Association, National District Attorneys Association, and National Sherrifs' Association submitted.

Motion of Texas, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin for leave to participate in oral argument and for divided argument submitted.

Brief amici curiae of National Indigenous Women's Resource Center et al. filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of National Association of Counties, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of Texas, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Amicus brief of National Indigenous Women's Resource Center and National Congress of American Indians submitted.

Record received from the U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit is electronic, complete and located on PACER.

Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)

CIRCULATED

Record received from the U.S.D.C. Southern Dist. of Alabama is electronic and located on PACER.

SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, December 5, 2018

Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by The Rutherford Institute.

Brief amicus curiae of The Rutherford Institute filed.

Brief amici curiae of Criminal Procedure Professors Stephen E. Henderson, et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Senator Orrin Hatch filed.

Brief amici curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed.

Brief amici curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center, et al. filed.

Brief amici curiae of U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Appellate Defense Division, et al. filed.

Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Howard University School of Law Thurgood Marshall Civil Rights Center in support of neither party filed.

Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)

Brief of petitioner Terance Gamble filed.

Motion for an extension of time to file the opening briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 4, 2018. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 25, 2018.

Motion for an extension of time to file the opening briefs on the merits filed.

Petition GRANTED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/27/2018.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/21/2018.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/14/2018.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/31/2018.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/24/2018.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/10/2018.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/27/2018.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/13/2018.

Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 2, 2018.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 3, 2018 to February 2, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.

Brief amici curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center and Cato Institute filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 4, 2017 to January 3, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.

Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 3, 2018.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 4, 2017)

Parties

Terance Gamble, Petitioner, represented by Louis A. Chaiten

United States, Respondent, represented by Jeffrey Bryan Wall

Amici Curiae

Constitutional Accountability Center and Cato Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Brianne Jenna Gorod

Criminal Defense Experts, Amicus Curiae, represented by Paul D. Clement

Criminal Procedure Professors Stephen E. Henderson, George C. Thomas, III, Michael J. Z. Mannheimer, and Kiel Brennan-Marquez, Amicus Curiae, represented by Peder K. Batalden

Howard University School of Law Thurgood Marshall Civil Rights Center, Amicus Curiae, represented by Adam Harris Kurland

Law Professors, Amicus Curiae, represented by Stuart Banner

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, National Association of Federal Defenders, and Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jonathan L. Marcus

Senator Orrin Hatch, Amicus Curiae, represented by Adam G. Unikowsky

The Rutherford Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by John W. Whitehead

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Appellate Defense Division, U.S. Coast Guard Office Of Member Advocacy And Legal Assistance—Appellate Defense, U.S. Air Force Appellate Defense Division, U.S. Army Defense Appellate Division, Amicus Curiae, represented by Daniel Evan Rosinski

 
Last updated: October 22, 2018