Decided

No. 17-961

Theodore H. Frank, et al. v. Paloma Gaos, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Opinion per curiam. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

Motion to extend the time to file the supplemental briefs and replies denied

Motion for an extension of time to file the supplemental briefs and replies filed.

The parties and the Solicitor General are directed to file supplemental briefs addressing whether any named plaintiff has standing such that the federal courts have Article III jurisdiction over this dispute. The briefs, not to exceed 6,000 words, are to be filed simultaneously with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 2 p.m., Friday, November 30, 2018. Reply briefs, not to exceed 3,000 words, are to be filed simultaneously with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 2 p.m., Friday, December 21, 2018.

Argued. For petitioners: Theodore H. Frank, Washington, D. C. For United States, as amicus curiae: Jeffrey B. Wall, Principal Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent Google LLC: Andrew J. Pincus, Washington, D. C. For respondents Gaos, et al.; Jeffrey A. Lamken, Washington, D. C.

Supplemental brief of respondents Paloma Gaos, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Supplemental brief of petitioners Theodore H. Frank, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Joint motion for divided argument filed by respondents GRANTED.

Motion for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed by Former Professor Roy A. Katriel DENIED.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.

Reply of petitioners Theodore H. Frank, et al. filed. (Distributed)

CIRCULATED

Application (18A242) to file a reply brief on the merits in excess of the word limit granted in part by The Chief Justice. Petitioners' reply brief on the merits may not exceed 7,000 words.

Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.

Brief amici curiae of Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation filed.

Brief amici curiae of National Consumer Law Center, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Amicus brief of National Consumer Law Center, et al. not accepted for filing. (Corrected brief to be resubmitted - September 10, 2018)

Joint motion for divided argument filed by respondents.

Brief amici curiae of Legal Aid Organizations filed.

Brief amicus curiae of American Association for Justice filed.

Brief amici curiae of States of Oregon, et al. filed.

Brief amici curiae of The Center for Democracy and Technology, et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Professor William B. Rubenstein filed.

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Center for Workplace Compliance filed.

Amicus brief of Professor William B. Rubenstein not accepted for filing. (Resubmitted with all required documentation - September 05, 2018)

Motion for enlargement of time for oral argument, for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed by Former Professor Roy A. Katriel.

Brief of respondent Google LLC filed.

Brief of respondents Paloma Gaos, et al. filed.

Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including July 9, 2018. The time to file respondents' briefs on the merits is extended to and including August 29, 2018.

Motion for an extension of time filed.

Petition GRANTED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/27/2018.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/13/2018.

Reply of petitioners Theodore H. Frank, et al. filed.

Brief of respondents Paloma Gaos, et al. in opposition filed.

Brief of respondent Google LLC in opposition filed.

Brief amici curiae of Attorney General of Arizona, et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Center for Individual Rights filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 9, 2018, for all respondents.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 7, 2018 to March 9, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 7, 2018)

Parties

Google LLC, Respondent, represented by Andrew John Pincus

Google LLC, Respondent, represented by Donald Manwell Falk

Paloma Gaos, et al., Respondent, represented by Jeffrey Alan Lamken

Amici Curiae

American Association for Justice, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jeffrey Robert White

Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Oramel Horace Skinner

Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, Amicus Curiae, represented by John C. Eastman

Center for Individual Rights, Amicus Curiae, represented by Michael E. Rosman

Center for Workplace Compliance, Amicus Curiae, represented by John Richard Annand

Civil Justice Research Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Gerson H. Smoger

Computer & Communications Industry and Technet, Amicus Curiae, represented by David H. Kramer

Law Professors, Amicus Curiae, represented by Lori B. Andrews

Legal Aid Organizations, Amicus Curiae, represented by Wilber H. Boies

National Consumer Law Center, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Stuart Todd Rossman

Professor William B. Rubenstein, Amicus Curiae, represented by William B. Rubenstein

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Allison M. Zieve

Spectrum Settlement Recovery, LLC, Amicus Curiae, represented by Eric Leslie Lewis

States of Oregon, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Benjamin Noah Gutman

The Center for Democracy and Technology, The Electronic Frontier Foundation, and The National Consumers League, Amicus Curiae, represented by Leslie M.F. Spencer

The New York Bar Foundation and The New York State Bar Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Christopher May Mason

 
Last updated: March 28, 2024