from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
See other cases from the District of Columbia Circuit.
Adjudged to be AFFIRMED and REMANDED (No. 18-587 Vacated in Part, Reversed in Part, and Remanded, and No. 18-589 February 13, 2018 order Vacated, November 9, 2017 order Affirmed in Part, March 29, 2018 order Reversed in Part, and case Remanded). Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, except as to Part IV. Ginsburg, Breyer, and Kagan, JJ., joined that opinion in full, and Sotomayor, J., joined as to all but Part IV. Sotomayor, J., filed an opinion concurring in part, concurring in the judgment in part, and dissenting in part. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part, in which Alito and Gorsuch, JJ., joined. Alito, J., and Kavanaugh, J., filed opinions concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. VIDED.
Argued. For petitioners: Noel J. Francisco, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For private respondents: Theodore B. Olson, Washington, D. C. For state respondents: Michael J. Mongan, Solicitor General, San Francisco, Cal. VIDED.
Record received from the U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit, is electronic
Record requested from the U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit.
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, November 12, 2019. VIDED
Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 18-587. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 18-587. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the fling is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”
Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 18-587 and the petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment in No. 18-589 are granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED.
Reply of petitioners Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed.
Brief of respondents Trustees of Princeton University, Microsoft Corporation, Maria De La Cruz Perales Sanchez in opposition filed.
Letter of November 27, 2018 from the Solicitor General with respect to corrected supplemental brief of petitioners filed in case No. 18-587 filed. (11/28/2018)
Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 5, 2018)
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Petitioner, represented by Noel J. Francisco
Princeton University, Microsoft Corporation, Maria De La Cruz Perales Sanchez, Respondent, represented by Lindsay C. Harrison
Former Homeland Security and Immigration Officials, Amicus Curiae, represented by Albert Quoc Giang
IMMIGRATION LAW SCHOLARS, Amicus Curiae, represented by Harry Lee
National Education Association and National PTA, Amicus Curiae, represented by Alice Margaret O'Brien
THE STATES OF TEXAS, ALABAMA, ARIZONA, ARKANSAS, FLORIDA, LOUISIANA, NEBRASKA, SOUTH CAROLINA, AND WEST VIRGINIA, AND GOVERNOR PHIL BRYANT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Amicus Curiae, represented by Kyle Douglas Hawkins
United We Dream and 50 Organizations, Amicus Curiae, represented by Peter Karanjia