Decided

No. 18-8369

Arthur J. Lomax v. Christina Ortiz-Marquez, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

See other cases from the Tenth Circuit.

Docket Entries

JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined, and in which Thomas, J., joined as to all but footnote 4.

Argued. For petitioner: Brian T. Burgess, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Eric R. Olson, Solicitor General, Denver, Colo.; and Jeffrey A. Rosen, Deputy Attorney General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)

Reply of petitioner Arthur Lomax filed. (Distributed)

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.

Amicus brief of United States not accepted for filing. (January 22, 2020 - Correct electronic file to be submitted.)

Brief amici curiae of Arizona, Connecticut, and 30 other states filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of Council of State Governments, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.

Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed)

CIRCULATED

Brief of respondents Christina Ortiz-Marquez, et al. filed.

Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit.

The record from the U.S.C.A. 10th circuit is electronic and located on PACER.

Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Roderick and Solange MacArthur Justice Center in support of neither party filed.

SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, February 26, 2020.

Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED limited to the following question: Does a dismissal without prejudice for failure to state a claim count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. ยง1915(g)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.

Reply of petitioner Arthur Lomax filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 1, 2019.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 30, 2019 to July 1, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.

Response Requested. (Due May 30, 2019)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.

Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 10, 2019)

Parties

Arthur Lomax, Petitioner, represented by Brian Timothy Burgess

Arthur Lomax, Petitioner, pro se

Amici Curiae

Arizona, Connecticut, and 30 other states, Amicus Curiae, represented by Drew Curtis Ensign

Council of State Governments, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Misha Tseytlin

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amicus Curiae, represented by Anthony F. Shelley

Roderick and Solange MacArthur Justice Center, Amicus Curiae, represented by David Michael Shapiro

United States, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jeffrey Adam Rosen

United States, Amicus Curiae, represented by Noel J. Francisco

 
Last updated: December 12, 2024