Petition Filed

No. 18-956

Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

See other cases from the Federal Circuit.

Docket Entries

Brief amicus curiae of Red Hat, Inc. filed.(3/11/2019)

Amicus brief of Red Hat, Inc. not accepted for filing. (March 11, 2019)(Corrected version submitted).

Brief amici curiae of Mozilla Corp., et al. filed.

Brief amici curiae of Software Innovators, Startups, and Investors filed.

Brief amici curiae of Python Software Foundation and Tidelift filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Engine Advocacy filed.

Brief amicus curiae of American Antitrust Institute filed.

Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Seventy Eight Computer Scientists.

Brief amicus curiae of Computer & Communications Industry Association filed.

Brief amici curiae of Sixty Five Intellectual Property Scholars filed.

Brief amici curiae of Professors Peter S. Menell and David Nimmer filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation filed.

Brief amici curiae of R Street Institute and Public Knowledge filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Microsoft Corporation filed.

Amicus brief of Computer & Communications Industry Association not accepted for filing. (February 25, 2019) (Corrected electronic filing submitted)

Brief amicus curiae of Developers Alliance filed.

Brief amici curiae of Eight Intellectual Property Scholars filed.

Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Google LLC.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 27, 2019.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 25, 2019 to March 27, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 25, 2019)

Application (18A417) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until January 25, 2019.

Application (18A417) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 26, 2018 to January 25, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Parties

Google LLC, Petitioner, represented by Kannon K. Shanmugam

Oracle America, Inc., Respondent, represented by E. Joshua Rosenkranz

Amici Curiae

American Antitrust Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Randy M. Stutz

Computer & Communications Industry Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jonathan Band

Developers Alliance, Amicus Curiae, represented by James Harold Hulme

Eight Intellectual Property Scholars, Amicus Curiae, represented by Christopher Theodore Bavitz

Electronic Frontier Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Michael Barclay

Engine Advocacy, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jeffrey Theodore Pearlman

Microsoft Corporation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jeffrey Alan Lamken

MOZILLA CORP., MAPBOX, A MEDIUM CORP., PATREON, ETSY, INC. AND WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jason M. Schultz

Professors Peter S. Menell and David Nimmer, Amicus Curiae, represented by Peter S. Menell

Python Software Foundation and Tidelift, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jill Margaret Wheaton

Red Hat, Inc., Amicus Curiae, represented by Andrew Phillip Bridges

R Street Institute and Public Knowledge, Amicus Curiae, represented by Charles Duan

Seventy Eight Computer Scientists, Amicus Curiae, represented by Phillip Robert Malone

Sixty Five Intellectual Property Scholars, Amicus Curiae, represented by Catherine Newby Crump

Software Innovators, Startups, and Investors, Amicus Curiae, represented by Joseph Carl Cecere

 
Last updated: March 19, 2019