Certiorari Granted

No. 19-1442

Willie Earl Carr, et al. v. Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

See other cases from the Tenth Circuit.

Docket Entries

CIRCULATED

Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners in No. 19-1442 GRANTED.

Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners in No. 20-105 GRANTED.

Amicus brief of The New Civil Liberties Alliance & Cato Institute not accepted for filing. (January 05, 2021 - Corrected version to be submitted).

Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed. VIDED.

Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Disability Representatives filed.VIDED

Brief amici curiae of Social Security, Government Benefit Program and Administrative Law Professors and Scholars filed. VIDED.

Brief amici curiae of National Organization of Social Security Claimants' Representatives, et al. filed. VIDED.

SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, March 3, 2021. VIDED.

Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Justice filed. VIDED.

Brief of petitioners Willie Earl Carr, et al. filed.

Brief of petitioners John J. Davis, Thomas Hilliard, Kimberly L. Iwan, Destiny M. Thurman (in 20-105) filed.

Brief amici curiae of Conference of Social Security Administrative Law Judges in support of neither party filed.

Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners in No. 19-1442.

Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners in No. 20-105.

Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, John J. Davis, Thomas Hilliard, Kimberly L. Iwan, Destiny M. Thurman

As Rule 34.6 provides, “If the Court schedules briefing and oral argument in a case that was governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c) or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1(c), the parties shall submit electronic versions of all prior and subsequent filings with this Court in the case, subject to [applicable] redaction rules.” Subsequent party and amicus filings in the case should now be submitted through the Court’s electronic filing system, with any necessary redactions.

Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 19-1442. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 19-1442. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”

Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 20-105 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.

Reply of petitioners Willie Earl Carr, et al. filed.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.

Brief of respondent Saul, Andrew M. filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 30, 2020.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 31, 2020 to September 30, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.

Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 31, 2020)

Parties

John J. Davis, Thomas Hilliard, Kimberly L. Iwan, Destiny M. Thurman, Petitioner, represented by Kannon K. Shanmugam

Willie Earl Carr, et al., Petitioner, represented by Sarah Michelle Harris

Willie Earl Carr, et al., Petitioner, represented by Lisa Schiavo Blatt

Saul, Andrew M., Respondent, represented by Jeffrey B. Wall

Amici Curiae

Conference of Social Security Administrative Law Judges, Amicus Curiae, represented by Alan B. Morrison

Institute for Justice, Amicus Curiae, represented by Robert Everett Johnson

National Association of Disability Representatives, Amicus Curiae, represented by Chanakya Arjun Sethi

National Organization of Social Security Claimants' Representatives, AARP and AARP Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Carolyn A. Kubitschek

Pacific Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Brian Trevor Hodges

Social Security, Government Benefit Program and Administrative Law Professors and Scholars, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jon C. Dubin

The New Civil Liberties Alliance & Cato Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jared Alan McClain

 
Last updated: January 15, 2021