from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
See other cases from the Tenth Circuit.
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Alito, Kagan, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined, in which Thomas, Gorsuch, and Barrett, JJ., joined as to Parts I, II–A, and II–B–2, and in which Breyer, J., joined as to Parts I, II–B–1, and II–B–2. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which Gorsuch and Barrett, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. VIDED.
Argued. For petitioners: Sarah M. Harris, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Austin Raynor, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Washington, D. C. VIDED.
Reply of petitioners John J. Davis, Thomas Hilliard, Kimberly L. Iwan, Destiny M. Thurman filed (in 20-105). (Distributed)
Reply of petitioners Willie Earl Carr, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Record received from the U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit is electronically filed.
Brief of respondent Saul, Andrew M., Commissioner of Social Security filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit.
CIRCULATED
Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners in No. 19-1442 GRANTED.
Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners in No. 20-105 GRANTED.
Amicus brief of The New Civil Liberties Alliance & Cato Institute not accepted for filing. (January 05, 2021 - Corrected version to be submitted).
Brief amici curiae of The New Civil Liberties Alliance & Cato Institute filed. VIDED.
Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed. VIDED.
Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Disability Representatives filed.VIDED
Brief amici curiae of National Organization of Social Security Claimants' Representatives, et al. filed. VIDED.
Brief amici curiae of Social Security, Government Benefit Program and Administrative Law Professors and Scholars filed. VIDED.
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, March 3, 2021. VIDED.
Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Justice filed. VIDED.
Brief of petitioners Willie Earl Carr, et al. filed.
Brief of petitioners John J. Davis, Thomas Hilliard, Kimberly L. Iwan, Destiny M. Thurman (in 20-105) filed.
Brief amici curiae of Collective of Social Security Administration Administrative Law Judges in support of neither party filed.
Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners in No. 19-1442.
Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners in No. 20-105.
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, John J. Davis, Thomas Hilliard, Kimberly L. Iwan, Destiny M. Thurman
Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 20-105 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED.
As Rule 34.6 provides, “If the Court schedules briefing and oral argument in a case that was governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c) or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1(c), the parties shall submit electronic versions of all prior and subsequent filings with this Court in the case, subject to [applicable] redaction rules.” Subsequent party and amicus filings in the case should now be submitted through the Court’s electronic filing system, with any necessary redactions.
Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 19-1442. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 19-1442. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”
Reply of petitioners Willie Earl Carr, et al. filed.
Brief of respondent Saul, Andrew M. filed.
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 30, 2020.
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 31, 2020 to September 30, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 31, 2020)
John J. Davis, Thomas Hilliard, Kimberly L. Iwan, Destiny M. Thurman, Petitioner, represented by Kannon K. Shanmugam
Willie Earl Carr, et al., Petitioner, represented by Sarah Michelle Harris
Willie Earl Carr, et al., Petitioner, represented by Lisa Schiavo Blatt
Saul, Andrew M., Respondent, represented by Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Collective of Social Security Administration Administrative Law Judges, Amicus Curiae, represented by Alan B. Morrison
Institute for Justice, Amicus Curiae, represented by Robert Everett Johnson
National Association of Disability Representatives, Amicus Curiae, represented by Chanakya Arjun Sethi
National Organization of Social Security Claimants' Representatives, AARP and AARP Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Carolyn A. Kubitschek
Pacific Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Brian Trevor Hodges
Social Security, Government Benefit Program and Administrative Law Professors and Scholars, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jon C. Dubin
The New Civil Liberties Alliance & Cato Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jared Alan McClain