from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
See other cases from the Tenth Circuit.
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined. Gorsuch, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas and Alito, JJ., joined. Barrett, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Argued. For petitioner: Kelsi B. Corkran, Washington, D. C.; and Rebecca Taibleson, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Mark D. Standridge, Las Cruces, N. M.
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, October 14, 2020.
Argument to be rescheduled for the October Term 2020.
Reply of petitioner Roxanne Torres filed. (Distributed)
ORAL ARGUMENT POSTPONED.
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
Brief amici curiae of National Association of Counties, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Brief of respondents Janice Madrid, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit.
CIRCULATED
The record of the USCA 10th Circuit is available on PACER.
Brief amici curiae of The Rutherford Institute and National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.
Brief amici curiae of The American Association for Justice, the Cato Institute, et al. filed.
Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.
Brief amici curiae of Fourth Amendment Scholars filed.
Brief amicus curiae of NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed.
Brief of petitioner Roxanne Torres filed.
Joint appendix filed.
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, March 30, 2020.
Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, Janice Madrid, et al.
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Roxanne Torres.
Petition GRANTED.
Reply of petitioner Roxanne Torres filed.
Brief of respondents Janice Madrid, et al. in opposition filed.
Response Requested. (Due November 12, 2019)
Brief amici curiae of Fourth Amendment Scholars filed.
Brief amicus curiae of The Rutherford Institute filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.
Waiver of right of respondent Janice Madrid, et al. to respond filed.
Brief amici curiae of The American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of New Mexico, filed.
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 4, 2019)
Application (19A45) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until August 30, 2019.
Application (19A45) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 31, 2019 to August 30, 2019, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Janice Madrid, et al., Respondent, represented by Mark Daniel Standridge
American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of New Mexico, Amicus Curiae, represented by David D. Cole
Constitutional Accountability Center, Amicus Curiae, represented by Brianne Jenna Gorod
Fourth Amendment Scholars, Amicus Curiae, represented by Ginger D. Anders
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., Amicus Curiae, represented by Jin Hee Lee
National Association of Counties, National League of Cities, U.S. Conference of Mayors, International City/County Management Association, International Municipal Lawyers association, and National Sheriffs' Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Barrett James Anderson
Restore the Fourth, Inc., Amicus Curiae, represented by Mahesha Padmanabhan Subbaraman
The American Association for the Justice, Cato Institute, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Anton Metlitsky
The Rutherford Institute and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jeffrey T. Green
United States, Amicus Curiae, represented by Elizabeth B. Prelogar