from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.
Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)
Reply of petitioners Howard Baldwin, et al. filed.
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 9, 2019.
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 25, 2019 to December 9, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
Brief amicus curiae of New England Legal Foundation filed.
Brief amici curiae of The Cato Institute filed.
Brief amicus curiae of National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc. filed.
Brief amici curiae of Americans for Prosperity and Cause of Action Institute filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.
Brief amicus curiae of Goldwater Institute filed.
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 25, 2019.
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 25, 2019 to November 25, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Howard Baldwin, et al.
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 25, 2019)
Howard Baldwin, et al., Petitioner, represented by Aditya Dynar
United States of America, Respondent, represented by Noel J. Francisco
Americans for Prosperity and Cause of Action Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by John Julian Vecchione
Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, Amicus Curiae, represented by Anthony Thomas Caso
Goldwater Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Timothy Mason Sandefur
National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc., Amicus Curiae, represented by Raymond J. LaJeunesse Jr.
New England Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by John Pagliaro
The Cato Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Ilya Shapiro