Decided

No. 19-67

United States v. Evelyn Sineneng-Smith

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Thomas, J., filed a concurring opinion.

Argued. For petitioner: Eric J. Feigin, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Mark C. Fleming, Boston, Mass.

Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of Immigration Representatives and Organizations filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of The Electronic Frontier Foundation, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of Religious Organizations filed. (Distributed)

Brief amicus curiae of Amnesty International filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed. (January 28, 2020). (Distributed)

Amicus brief of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers not accepted for filing. (January 28, 2020 - Corrected brief to be submitted.)

Brief amici curiae of Asian Americans Advancing Justice, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of City and County of San Francisco, et al. filed. (Distributed)

Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed. (Distributed)

CIRCULATED

Brief amici curiae of The Rutherford Institute, et al. filed. (Distributed)

The record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit and from the U.S.D.C. California Northern District (San Jose) is electronic and located on PACER, and sealed record material from both courts received by Clerk and available electronically.

Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.

The record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.

Brief amicus curiae of Immigration Reform Law Institute filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Eugene Volokh in support of neither party filed.

Brief of petitioner United States filed.

Joint appendix filed.

SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, February 25, 2020.

Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including December 2, 2019. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including January 15, 2020.

Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.

Brief of respondent Evelyn Sineneng-Smith in opposition filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 28, 2019.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 12, 2019 to August 28, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 12, 2019)

Application (18A1117) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 12, 2019.

Application (18A1117) to extend further the time from June 12, 2019 to July 12, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Application (18A1117) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until June 12, 2019.

Application (18A1117) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 13, 2019 to June 12, 2019, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Parties

United States, Petitioner, represented by Noel J. Francisco

Evelyn Sineneng-Smith, Respondent, represented by Mark Christopher Fleming

Amici Curiae

Amnesty International, Amicus Curiae, represented by Matthew S. Hellman

Asian Americans Advancing Justice, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Emily Tomoko Barner Kuwahara

City and County of San Francisco, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Erin Lee Kuka

Eugene Volokh, Amicus Curiae, represented by Eugene Volokh

Immigration Reform Law Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Lawrence J. Joseph

Immigration Representatives and Organizations, Amicus Curiae, represented by William Collins Perdue

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amicus Curiae, represented by Elliott Schulder

Religious Organizations, Amicus Curiae, represented by Anton Metlitsky

The Cato Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Ilya Shapiro

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, Immigrants Rising, The Internet Archive, Daphne Keller, Amicus Curiae, represented by David Allen Greene

The Rutherford Institute, ACLU, ACLU of Northern California, and SEIU, Amicus Curiae, represented by Erin Glenn Busby

 
Last updated: October 26, 2020