from the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office
See other cases from Pennsylvania.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
Reply of petitioner Lei Ke filed. (Distributed)
Brief of respondent Drexel University in opposition filed.
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 18, 2020.
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 17, 2020 to February 18, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2020)
Application (19A494) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until December 23, 2019.
Application (19A494) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 18, 2019 to December 23, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.
Lei Ke, Petitioner, pro se
Drexel University, Respondent, represented by Lois M. Shenk