Certiorari Granted

No. 19-783

Nathan Van Buren v. United States

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

See other cases from the Eleventh Circuit.

Docket Entries

SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, November 30, 2020.

Brief amicus curiae of Voatz, Inc. filed.

Brief amici curiae of Electronic Privacy Information Center, et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Digital Justice Foundation filed.

Brief amici curiae of Karen Heart and Anthony Volini of CIPLIT filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Managed Funds Association filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association filed.

Brief of respondent United States filed.

Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.

Brief amici curiae of Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of The Markup filed.

Brief amici curiae of Computer Security Researchers, et al. filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Orin S. Kerr filed.

Brief amici curiae of Technology Companies filed.

Brief amicus curiae of The United States Technology Policy Committee of the ACM in support of neither party filed.

Brief amici curiae of National Whistleblower Center filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Americans for Prosperity Foundation filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Committee for Justice filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Association of Medical Device Service Organizations filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Association of Medical Device Reprocessors filed.

Brief amici curiae of Kyratso Karahalios, et al. filed.

Brief amici curiae of The R Street Institute, et al. filed.

Brief of petitioner Nathan Van Buren filed.

Joint appendix filed.

Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Nathan Van Buren

Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 1, 2020. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 27, 2020.

Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.

Petition GRANTED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.

Reply of petitioner Nathan Van Buren filed.

Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 10, 2020.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 18, 2020 to March 10, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.

Brief amici curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation, et al. filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 18, 2020.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 17, 2020 to February 18, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.

Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Nathan Van Buren.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 17, 2020)

Parties

Nathan Van Buren, Petitioner, represented by Jeffrey L. Fisher

United States, Respondent, represented by Jeffrey B. Wall

Amici Curiae

Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Russel James Valvo III

Association of Medical Device Reprocessors, Amicus Curiae, represented by Stephen David Terman

Association of Medical Device Service Organizations, Amicus Curiae, represented by John Garfield Dillard

Committee for Justice, Amicus Curiae, represented by Anthony John Dick

Digital Justice Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Edward Francis Cunningham

Electronic Privacy Information Center, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Alan Jay Butler

Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Joseph Vecchione DeMarco

Karen Heart and Anthony Volini of CIPLIT, Amicus Curiae, represented by Karen Heart

Kyratso Karahalios, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Esha Bhandari

Managed Funds Association, Amicus Curiae, represented by Joseph Vecchione DeMarco

National Whistleblower Center, Amicus Curiae, represented by Stephen M. Kohn

Orin S. Kerr, Amicus Curiae, represented by Orin S. Kerr

Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, et al., Amicus Curiae, represented by Kannon K. Shanmugam

Technology Companies, Amicus Curiae, represented by Mark A. Lemley

The Markup, Amicus Curiae, represented by Katherine M. Bolger

The R Street Institute, Public Knowledge, Lincoln Network, Engine Advocacy, the Innovation Defense Foundation, and the American Antitrust Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Charles Duan

The United States Technology Policy Committee of the ACM, Amicus Curiae, represented by Andrew Grosso

Voatz, Inc., Amicus Curiae, represented by Jared Lee Hubbard

 
Last updated: September 25, 2020