Denied

No. 19-8075

S. Patrick Mendel v. UBER Technologies, Inc., et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.

Waiver of right of respondents City and County of San Francisco, et al. to respond filed.

Waiver of right of respondents Uber Technologies, Inc.; Rasier-CA, LLC; Uber USA, LLC; Travis Kalanick; Garrett Camp; Ryan Graves to respond filed.

Waiver of right of respondents Marybel Batjer, Michael Picker, Carla J. Peterman, Liane Randolph, Clifford Rechtschaffen, Martha Guzman Aceves, Genevieve Shiroma, and Maritza Perez to respond filed.

Waiver of right of respondent California Attorney General Xavier Becerra to respond filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 22, 2020)

Parties

S. Patrick Mendel, Petitioner, pro se

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, Respondent, represented by Paul Evan Stein

City and County of San Francisco, et al., Respondent, represented by Raymond R. Rollan

Marybel Batjer, Michael Picker, Carla J. Peterman, Liane Randolph, Clifford Rechtschaffen, Martha Guzman Aceves, Genevieve Shiroma, and Maritza Perez, Respondent, represented by Edward Moldavsky

Uber Technologies, Inc.; Rasier-CA, LLC; Uber USA, LLC; Travis Kalanick; Garrett Camp; Ryan Graves, Respondent, represented by Brian C Rocca

Uber Technologies, Inc.; Rasier-CA, LLC; Uber USA, LLC; Travis Kalanick; Garrett Camp; Ryan Graves, Respondent, represented by Thomas M. Peterson

 
Last updated: November 29, 2020