from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
See other cases from the Third Circuit.
JUDGMENT ISSUED
Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Alito, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Gorsuch, J., joined as to Part I. Breyer, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
Argued. For petitioners: Austin Raynor, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Pratik A. Shah, Washington, D. C.
CIRCULATED
The record from the U.S.C.A. 3rd Circuit and for the U.S.D.C. Middle District of Pennsylvania (Harrisburg) has been electronically filed.
Brief amici curiae of Former Immigration Judges and Board of Immigration Appeals Members filed (also in 20-322). VIDED.
Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed (also in 20-322). VIDED.
Brief amici curiae of Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Asian Law Caucus, et al filed (also in 20-322). VIDED.
Brief of respondent Antonio Arteaga-Martinez filed.
Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 3rd Circuit.
ARGUMENT SET FOR Tuesday, January 11, 2022.
Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners GRANTED.
Brief of petitioners Tae D. Johnson, et al. filed.
Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Tae D. Johnson, et al.
Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 14, 2021. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including November 22, 2021.
Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.
Petition GRANTED.
As Rule 34.6 provides, “If the Court schedules briefing and oral argument in a case that was governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c) or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1(c), the parties shall submit electronic versions of all prior and subsequent filings with this Court in the case, subject to [applicable] redaction rules.” Subsequent party and amicus filings in the case should now be submitted through the Court’s electronic filing system, with any necessary redactions.
Reply of petitioners Matthew T. Albence, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until May 19, 2020, granted.
Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from May 12, 2020 to May 19, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 22, 2020.
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 23, 2020 to April 22, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and shouild not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 20, 2020)
Application (19A515) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until January 17, 2020.
Application (19A515) to extend further the time from December 18, 2019 to January 17, 2020, submitted to Justice Alito.
Application (19A515) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until December 18, 2019.
Application (19A515) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 18, 2019 to December 18, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.
Asian-Americans Advancing Justice-Asian Law Caucus, et al, Amicus Curiae, represented by Nancy Morawetz
Constitutional Accountability Center, Amicus Curiae, represented by Brianne Jenna Gorod
Former Immigration Judges and Board of Immigration Appeals Members, Amicus Curiae, represented by Joseph Russell Palmore