Record returned to the U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit. (1-Box)

JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Argued. For petitioners: Sarah M. Harris, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Austin Raynor, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Washington, D. C. VIDED.

Record received from the U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit. (1-Box)

Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 8th Circuit.

CIRCULATED

SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, March 3, 2021. VIDED.

As Rule 34.6 provides, “If the Court schedules briefing and oral argument in a case that was governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c) or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1(c), the parties shall submit electronic versions of all prior and subsequent filings with this Court in the case, subject to [applicable] redaction rules.” Subsequent party and amicus filings in the case should now be submitted through the Court’s electronic filing system, with any necessary redactions.

Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 19-1442. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 19-1422. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”

Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 19-1442 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.

Reply of petitioners John Davis, et al. filed. (Distributed)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.

Rescheduled.

Brief of respondent Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 29, 2020.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 31, 2020 to September 29, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.

Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 31, 2020)

John Davis, et al., Petitioner, represented by Kannon K. Shanmugam

Saul, Andrew, Respondent, represented by Brian H. Fletcher