Decided

No. 20-1212

Peyman Pakdel, et ux. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Court. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.

Rescheduled.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.

Rescheduled.

Brief of respondents City and County of San Francisco, et al. in opposition filed.

Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.

Brief amicus curiae of Pelican Institute for Public Policy filed.

Brief amici curiae of Southeastern Legal Foundation; National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center; Texas Public Policy Foundation filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 3, 2021.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 2, 2021 to May 3, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.

Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Peyman Pakdel, et al.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 2, 2021)

Parties

Peyman Pakdel, et al., Petitioner, represented by Jeffrey Wilson McCoy

City and County of San Francisco, et al., Respondent, represented by Kristen Ann Jensen

City and County of San Francisco, et al., Respondent, represented by Kristen A. Jensen

Amici Curiae

Pelican Institute for Public Policy, Amicus Curiae, represented by Sarah Elizabeth Roy Harbison

Southeastern Legal Foundation; National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center; Texas Public Policy Foundation, Amicus Curiae, represented by Kimberly Stewart Hermann

The Cato Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Ilya Shapiro

 
Last updated: December 21, 2024