JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. See Adams v. Clinton, 531 U. S. 941 (2000). Justice Thomas and Justice Gorsuch would dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.

Opposition to motion to dismiss or affirm filed by appellants Angelica Castañon, et al.

Motion to dismiss or affirm filed by appellees United States, et al.

Notice of withdrawal of appellant Susannah Weaver received.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including June 14, 2021, for all appellees.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 14, 2021 to June 14, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 14, 2021, for all appellees.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 14, 2021 to May 14, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.

Statement as to jurisdiction filed. (Response due April 14, 2021)

Application (20A119) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until March 12, 2021.

Application (20A119) to extend the time to file a jurisdictional statement on appeal from January 12, 2021 to March 12, 2021, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Angelica Castañon, et al., Appellant, represented by Christopher J. Wright

United States, et al., Appellant, represented by Brian H. Fletcher

Constitutional Law Scholars, Amicus Curiae, represented by William R. Stein

District of Columbia Affairs Community of the District of Columbia Bar, and Other Concerned District of Columbia Legal Organizations and Professionals, Amicus Curiae, represented by Lorelie Sue Masters

District of Columbia Historians, Amicus Curiae, represented by Catherine Emily Stetson

Office of General Counsel of the U.S. House of Representatives, Amicus Curiae, represented by Douglas Neal Letter