Denied

No. 20-132

The Moodsters Company v. The Walt Disney Company, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.

Reply of petitioner The Moodsters Company filed.

Brief of respondents The Walt Disney Company, et al. in opposition filed.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 13, 2020.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 16, 2020 to November 13, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.

Response Requested. (Due October 16, 2020)

Brief amicus curiae of California Society of Entertainment Lawyers filed. (Distributed)

Brief amici curiae of Suna Izgi, Orly Ravid, Robert C. Lind and Michael M. Epstein filed. (Distributed)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.

Waiver of right of respondent The Walt Disney Company, et al. to respond filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 8, 2020)

Parties

The Moodsters Company, Petitioner, represented by Patrick Malin Arenz

The Walt Disney Company, et al., Respondent, represented by Mark Remy Yohalem

The Walt Disney Company, et al., Respondent, represented by Erin Joan Cox

Amici Curiae

California Society of Entertainment Lawyers, Amicus Curiae, represented by Steven T. Lowe

Suna Izgi, Orly Ravid, Robert C. Lind and Michael M. Epstein, Amicus Curiae, represented by Michael Meredith Epstein

 
Last updated: July 28, 2021