Denied

No. 20-1349

Rachel Threatt v. Ryan Thomas Farrell, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

See other cases from the Ninth Circuit.

Docket Entries

Petition DENIED.

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.

Reply of petitioner Rachel Threatt filed. (Distributed)

Letter from Bank of America, N.A. received.

Brief of respondents Ryan Thomas Farell, et al. in opposition filed.

Letter from Estefania Osorio Sanchez received.

Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 12, 2021, for all respondents.

Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 10, 2021 to July 12, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.

Response Requested. (Due June 10, 2021)

DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.

Waiver of right of respondent Estefania Osorio Sanchez to respond filed.

Waiver of right of respondent Amy Collins to respond filed.

Brief amici curiae of National Retail Federation and Restaurant Law Center filed.

Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.

Waiver of right of respondents Ryan Thomas Farell, et al. to respond filed.

Brief amici curiae of Attorney General of Arizona, et at., filed.

Waiver of right of respondent Bank of America, N.A. to respond filed.

Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 26, 2021)

Parties

Rachel Threatt, Petitioner, represented by Theodore Harold Frank

Amy Collins, Respondent, represented by Robert William Clore

Bank of America, N.A., Respondent, represented by Jonathan D. Hacker

Estefania Osorio Sanchez, Respondent, represented by N. Albert Bacharach Jr.

Ryan Thomas Farell, et al., Respondent, represented by Deepak Gupta

Amici Curiae

Attorney General of Arizona et al, Amicus Curiae, represented by Kate Blakeley Sawyer

National Retail Federation and Restaurant Law Center, Amicus Curiae, represented by H. Christopher Bartolomucci

The Cato Institute, Amicus Curiae, represented by Jeremy Lynn Kidd

 
Last updated: December 12, 2024